Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:50 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:19 pm
Posts: 906
Location: SoCal, USA
i used to Crop a lot with my D200!!!
but when i shoot with D2H, i find croping is hard! b/c the file size is much smaller. i can't really crop...

so what i learn is, i have to frame my **** right everytime!! there is no cropping in pp haha

just like shooting with film camera, haha cropping? ya rite!!!

_________________
Nikon D2h | Noct-Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 | Nikkor 35mm f/1.4| Nikon 85mm f1.4 |SB-600 SB-28 SB-28
" The best camera is the one that's with you" Chase Jarvis
flickr
Blog


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:21 am
Posts: 186
Location: Ireland
there was a time we all used film, way back in the pre-digi-cam days. Though mostly with crappy old Agfa p&s film cams [yup, there was point and shoot/click before digital!] Cropping back then was done with a scissors :lol:

_________________
Flickr | Pix.ie


Nikon D90: Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, Vivitar 70-210mm f/3.5, Next up: Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:11 am
Posts: 63
Yes I've heard from alot of smart photog that higher mega pixel is useless unless you do some extreme large prints.


But as a Computer Student (me), I personally believe that the higher the mega pixel (say 18 MP) will look much sharper on my HD screen (basically Cramping 18 MP to 2 MP)...

Correct me if my concept is wrong.

_________________
I'm a Student.
Photograhy Status:
Beginner/Hobby/Learning

|Canon 550D |
| 50mm f/1.8 + Kenko UV Filter | 18-55 IS + Kenko MC UV Filter |
| Tamrac Velocity 7x |
| Silk 1000G |


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
I'd say try it for yourself. Get a large 18 MP image, and downsize a copy to 4 megapixels. If you have them on the screen, you will not see a difference, and maybe the 4 megapixel one will actually look sharper! (since it's resize algorithm is more advanced than on-the-fly downsizing).

It may be more Aliased (jagged edges) which is perceived sharpness, and something you can do better in postproduction, actually.

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 7999
Location: UK
All else being equal, an 18MP image resized to 4MP should look sharper than a camera native 4MP, as the 4MP is an interpolated output due to the bayer pattern. Reducing the 18MP to 4MP means each output pixel will contain the equivalent of more than 4 photosites of data and will gain positional accuracy. But you'd have to be really pixel peeping at this stage...

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 43
sounds like a good camera even today. i know from my personal experiences that i really like big cameras to work with (not so much to carry around) - they just feel more comfortable.

but i guess 4 megapixels would make it a no-go for me. i couldnt even make a desktop wallpaper with that for my 30 inch monitor (brag).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
You have a 2464x1632 screen?

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 43
Citruspers wrote:
You have a 2464x1632 screen?


2560x1600

which is about 4 megapixel, but its a 16:10 aspect ratio and i think the D2 makes 3:2 pictures.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
I call unfair :lol:

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:19 pm
Posts: 906
Location: SoCal, USA
lol...30 inch monitor... :P

anyways as for D2H post, i also post a new review on the Nikon DK-17M that goes with D2H and other D2/D3 models as well.
check here http://www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21346

_________________
Nikon D2h | Noct-Nikkor 58mm f/1.2 | Nikkor 35mm f/1.4| Nikon 85mm f1.4 |SB-600 SB-28 SB-28
" The best camera is the one that's with you" Chase Jarvis
flickr
Blog


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
Thanks Daniel :)

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:33 pm
Posts: 126
Location: UK
Look up Ken Rockwell's explanation of why mp dont matter. You can print a billboard with 4mp, you just have to stand back a bit to see a sharp image. I just bought myself a 1d classic, should be here tomorrow in the post. Its only 4mp but can do 8fps, has 45 af points and a pro body.

_________________
Canon 1D Classic
Canon 60d
Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS, 430ex, 50mm F1.8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 6009
Location: The Netherlands
I wouldn't be surprised if the 1D replaced your 450D for general shooting ;)
Nice purchase!

_________________
I take pictures so quickly, my highschool was "Continuous High".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:33 pm
Posts: 126
Location: UK
Yea, i think the 450d will be put in the lonely corner for a while, cant wait to get it. I will do a review similar to this one when i get to grips with it. :)

_________________
Canon 1D Classic
Canon 60d
Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS, 430ex, 50mm F1.8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:49 pm 
Printing high quality (300DPI) 30cm wide photos is impossible with 4MP.


Sooner or later you'll want to print a photo.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group