Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:02 am

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:38 pm 
heey guys
i am just new here ,i am so glad to be with u all :)

now,i am deciding to buy E520 ,and with 2 lenses
the lens kit 14-42 & 40-150 mm

and i want to have a Macro lens ,the decision that was avaliable for me was about the 35 mm & 50 mm macro !!
but i got a good deal with the Sigma 70-300 as i found a stock would sell it NEW for $100 !!!
and also i dont want to break my budget ,i am still new :)
so my questions is :
-is the Sigma 70-300 Capitable with the E520 ?do i need to buy an adapter? and if so what adapter shall i buy ?

-The Sigma 70-300 is it a good lens for macro using the E520?
or there may be some Conflicts when using it ?

please guy be a little specific cuz i am still new in camera world,so i want to get information as i can :)


 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:52 pm 
Sigma does not make it's 70-300mm lens for the Four-Thirds mount. I have heard however that the Olympus 70-300 is actually put together by Sigma but I dont know the truth of that.

Anyhow, the OLYMPUS 70-300mm is going to cost you aproximately $350 for a new one. However, before you purchase, consider if you really need that much telephoto, and if 150mm does not satisfy you. 150mm is quite a lot really on an Olympus camera. The only time I've ever used my 70-300mm was at an airshow and I will probably be selling it soon.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:48 am 
U r right
so now i put in my considiration the 35 mm macro lens
i found good deals in Ebay , 1 used for 58$ with no scratches
but i dont know will it be good or not
i mean maybe it could be deception or something like that??
i just need a trusted web site to sell used lenses to buy the 35 mm!!

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:08 pm 
why the forum is not active as i thought !!!


 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:45 pm 
The 35mm lens is not a very expensive lens because it doesn't really bring much to the table. Actually I am not very familiar with it, and I don't know anyone who has one, but I'd guess that its not very popular because of its relatively slow aperature for a prime lens. F/3.5 does not have any advantages over the kit lenses.

IMO if you're going to spend money on a lens, you can find a used 14-54 2.8-3.5 for not much money at all, and enjoy an even faster aperature at 35mm and a very good macro performance, as well as a weathersealed lens and a very good zoom range.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2009 8:04 pm 
If you want macro performance, go with the 35mm. But a better all-around choice is the 14-54(I). You can probably get an used 14-54(I) for about $280-320. There is a newer version of the 14-54(II), which is a whole lot more.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group