Gordon Laing wrote:
I found it only personally gave me 2-2.5 stops of compensation, whereas the Canon and Nikon kit lenses with stabilisation consistently gave me 3 to 4 stops. This was the same experience I had with the E-520.
Hmm I seem to recall that you did a side by side comparison of in body IS vs lens IS with the 510 and a Leica lens and you came to the conclusion that the in body was slightly more effective than lens IS. Does this mean that the pana/leica IS was just not as effective as canon and nikon IS?
What about the E-3? Did you personally get 5 stops as Oly claims?
Ill test this tomorrow and let you know, and then compare it to my 510 which I still have.
edit: Looks like I'm moving in on your job Gordon