Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:50 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: E620 High ISO results
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:14 pm
Posts: 669
I'm very impressed!

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/revie ... 10412.html

At 3200, these seem usable for casual use [facebook, etc.] at 1600? these are downright decent.... but at 800 those are perfectly good. Its amazing, theres almost no change between 200-400-800.

_________________
E-3!
12-60 2.8-4.0
12-60 2.8-40 [Also going]
40-150 3.5-4.5
70-300 4.0-5.6
Fl-48


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 6:00 pm
Posts: 2781
It's decent. Not earth shattering, but it is decent. I'm glad that they have a sensible noise reduction scheme where they are aggressive with chroma noise but leave luminance noise untouched.

Hopefully, Sony will follow suit since they're the only DSLR manufacturer who hasn't quite got high ISO noise reduction.

_________________
PhilipGoh.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:22 am
Posts: 340
Location: Oakland, CA
the iso looks very nice. it looks like olympus has been really trying to improve their noise performance. i would definitely like to see some more shots to test iso performance in "real life" examples.

_________________
www.iandavisphoto.com
aim s/n: idotddot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:14 pm
Posts: 669
I know photographyreview.com will be getting a production model real soon and they will definitely do this studio test here:

http://gallery.photographyreview.com/sh ... mpus+E-30|
http://gallery.photographyreview.com/sh ... mpus+E-3+|

as you can see from those, the E3 kicks the E30's butt when it comes to noise, it would be great to see how the E620 stacks up against the E3.

_________________
E-3!
12-60 2.8-4.0
12-60 2.8-40 [Also going]
40-150 3.5-4.5
70-300 4.0-5.6
Fl-48


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 2069
Location: Philadelphia, PA
it looks good 1600 is at last very usable, congrats Olympus!

_________________
RadiantLite - Cameras and Lenses Comparison Reviews, buying guide, photo taking techniques and other tips
My Portfolio - Some photos from my work


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:56 am
Posts: 175
Location: Chicago USA
Oly will really kick ass if it is possible to share noise reduction tech to other models, ex. my e520, by firmware update.

In my dream

_________________

Please forgive my poor English...
My camera gears
Sony M1
Olympus E-520
14-42mm, 40-150mm, 70-300mm
Wish list for now:
12-60mm or 14-54mm II, a decent tripod
flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/donalone/
design portfolio: http://www.id.iit.edu/~chlee
blog: http://donniett.spaces.live.com (Chinese)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:05 am
Posts: 576
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Atomic wrote:

as you can see from those, the E3 kicks the E30's butt when it comes to noise, it would be great to see how the E620 stacks up against the E3.


The photographyreview.com comparisons are much better than the other ones from that website that we couldn't read. On these photos, I agree that the E3 seems to handle ISO1600 and above better than the E30. That's too bad for the E30. Hopefully, the E620 will do a better job.

_________________
Olympus E620 | 25/2.8 | 50/2 | 12-60 | 14-42 | 14-54 | 40-150 | 70-300
Olympus E-P2 | Panasonic GH2 | 20/1.7 | 14-42 | 14-140
Leica M7 | M9 | 21/4 | 35/1.4 | 50/2.5 | 50/1.5 | 70/2.5 | 90/2
Sony NEX-3 | 16/2.8| 18-55
My FlickR!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:05 am
Posts: 576
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
That other site which I will not link to (dprev...) has a gallery of 21 photos taken with the E-620 using the 12-60. There are one or two photos taken at ISO 800 and 1600. They look usable for mid-sized prints. At 100%, the noise is troublesome.

_________________
Olympus E620 | 25/2.8 | 50/2 | 12-60 | 14-42 | 14-54 | 40-150 | 70-300
Olympus E-P2 | Panasonic GH2 | 20/1.7 | 14-42 | 14-140
Leica M7 | M9 | 21/4 | 35/1.4 | 50/2.5 | 50/1.5 | 70/2.5 | 90/2
Sony NEX-3 | 16/2.8| 18-55
My FlickR!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:56 am
Posts: 175
Location: Chicago USA
Armanius wrote:
That other site which I will not link to (dpre...)


Dpre... Depression?

Sorry being off topic

_________________

Please forgive my poor English...
My camera gears
Sony M1
Olympus E-520
14-42mm, 40-150mm, 70-300mm
Wish list for now:
12-60mm or 14-54mm II, a decent tripod
flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/donalone/
design portfolio: http://www.id.iit.edu/~chlee
blog: http://donniett.spaces.live.com (Chinese)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:14 pm
Posts: 669
donalone wrote:
Armanius wrote:
That other site which I will not link to (dpre...)


Dpre... Depression?

Sorry being off topic


he meant Dpreview, which is very unkind to competition and delete links to cameralabs if theyre posted on their forums.

_________________
E-3!
12-60 2.8-4.0
12-60 2.8-40 [Also going]
40-150 3.5-4.5
70-300 4.0-5.6
Fl-48


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:05 am
Posts: 576
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
LOL! Hehehe. Thanks for clarifying Atomic. I purposefully did not write the whole name in there! There is also a lot of hostility in the forum there. Just came from there ... lots of angst.

Atomic, sounds like you are seriously considering the E-620? It does look pretty sweet.

_________________
Olympus E620 | 25/2.8 | 50/2 | 12-60 | 14-42 | 14-54 | 40-150 | 70-300
Olympus E-P2 | Panasonic GH2 | 20/1.7 | 14-42 | 14-140
Leica M7 | M9 | 21/4 | 35/1.4 | 50/2.5 | 50/1.5 | 70/2.5 | 90/2
Sony NEX-3 | 16/2.8| 18-55
My FlickR!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:14 pm
Posts: 669
Yep, I know I want to update my body, but can't decide to which. I know I'll be staying with Olympus, despite being tempted by the D90.

Now I have to choose between E3, E30, and the E620. I decided the E30 is WORSE than the E3 [noise comparison was shocking how much the E3 was better] and then Olympus decided to throw a wrench in my decision by releasing the E620. Now Ill have to wait and see for a comparison of the E3 and the E620 side by side.

_________________
E-3!
12-60 2.8-4.0
12-60 2.8-40 [Also going]
40-150 3.5-4.5
70-300 4.0-5.6
Fl-48


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 2069
Location: Philadelphia, PA
get E-3 Atomic, especially if you value toughness and handling rather than compactness. I believe the E-3 iso is better too, or at least the same.

I also heard that with ur 12-60mm lens the AF will be the fastest on the world

_________________
RadiantLite - Cameras and Lenses Comparison Reviews, buying guide, photo taking techniques and other tips
My Portfolio - Some photos from my work


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:05 am
Posts: 576
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Is the E-3 really that much bigger and heavier than the E-510? The E-3 and E-30 appear to be about the same size.

_________________
Olympus E620 | 25/2.8 | 50/2 | 12-60 | 14-42 | 14-54 | 40-150 | 70-300
Olympus E-P2 | Panasonic GH2 | 20/1.7 | 14-42 | 14-140
Leica M7 | M9 | 21/4 | 35/1.4 | 50/2.5 | 50/1.5 | 70/2.5 | 90/2
Sony NEX-3 | 16/2.8| 18-55
My FlickR!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 2069
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Armanius wrote:
Is the E-3 really that much bigger and heavier than the E-510? The E-3 and E-30 appear to be about the same size.


it is a semi pro model so yeah it is bigger, almost the same as Nikon D300 or Canon 50D. The weight is 800g compare to 460g of E-520
so yeah it is almost double in weight.

check Gordon review:
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Olymp ... sign.shtml

It could be good and bad for you.

_________________
RadiantLite - Cameras and Lenses Comparison Reviews, buying guide, photo taking techniques and other tips
My Portfolio - Some photos from my work


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group