Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 5:43 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:40 am
Posts: 46
Location: Northern Ireland - Australia
Hello Thomas,

Finally I managed to read this review, marvelous.

I was very surprised at the 24-85, I didn't think it would come so close to the Nikon 24-70.

If you were to give the two Nikons an overall rating out of 100, would their be much of a gap?

Also IS, would not having it on the 24-70 put you off buying it?

_________________
Nikon D700, Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED

Future purchases: Nikkor 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8G ED & AF Fisheye 16mm f/2.8D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:03 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7794
Location: Germany
Colin, I'm afraid that I wouldn't give numeric ratings with my reviews. There are too many factors to be considered that may be more or less relevant for different shooting-conditions and different photographers.
So saying that a lens is "Recommended" or "Highly Recommended" just means that you should have a closer look at the good and bad points of this lens and find out whether it fits your demand(s).
An Example: whether a maximum aperture of f4.0 plus image stabilization is "better" for you than a maximum aperture of f2.8 with no image stabilization depends on the subjects and the shooting conditions:
- If you shoot fast action normally the faster lens would be preferred regardless of IS because you need the shortest possible shutter times.
- If you're carrying a tripod with you at all times, the lens with the best image quality might be your favorite
- If you're more the walk-about type that normally shoots not-so-fast moving subjects but needs some decent low-light capability than you might prefer the f4+VR version as the VR should more than compensate for the loss in maximum aperture.

I hope these examples make it clear that there seldom is a clear-cut answer as to "which lens is best".
Unless of course when the lens of a shootout has the largest aperture plus IS plus the best image quality plus the lowest price. 8)
But according to my crystal ball that is not going to happen soon...

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:40 am
Posts: 46
Location: Northern Ireland - Australia
Yes You're right, I thought about that when writing the question, and yes you've been very helpful. Well my main interest is architecture/street photography, sometimes I use my camera for landscape, but this is quite the exception.

Outside of this, in the future I might be doing wedding and real estate/realty photography.

So it doesn't seem i'd need a fast lense.

As for that perfect lense, yeah wouldn`t that be a dream 8)

_________________
Nikon D700, Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED

Future purchases: Nikkor 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8G ED & AF Fisheye 16mm f/2.8D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group