Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:11 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 32
Please read this qoute and tell me if this it's true. My questions are on the bottom:


"If you have never owned a DSLR this might be a little over
your head.

I must say that I only shoot RAW (NEF files) though. If you
are looking for something that spits out terrific jpegs right out
of the camera you may be a little disappointed. I don't
believe this camera was designed for that. The image quality
(IQ) is astonishing. I print portraits as large as 16x20 using
ISO 400 and my clients are very happy."

Here are my questions:

1. Is it true that this might be a little over our head especially if you're a beginner?

2. Can D200 produce beautiful pictures using JPEG without the need to manipulate the shots using photoshop?

3. Is it also true that Canon are good for sports/action shots over than the Nikons? What I'm trying to say is, is Nikon mainly use for portraits, lanscapes, and stationary objects???

Please help....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:28 pm
Posts: 131
Location: U.S.A
I think i've heard someone say that canons are better than nikon for sports/action but i don't really see why that would be true...

_________________
Nikon D40 + 18-135
My Flickr.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:43 pm
Posts: 631
Location: Portugal
No, Canons are good for...

Image

*ducks for cover*

Source for photo: webpark.ru

_________________
Nikon D90 + MB-D80 + SB-600 + AF-S VR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 + AF-S 35mm f/1.8 + AF 85mm f/1.8 | My photos on Flickr.


Last edited by luis on Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:52 am
Posts: 344
Location: Sabah, Malaysia
Hi
I'm giving my 2 cts,

Canon - was ahead for sports / action because it was the only FF before Nikon's D3 announcement, which gave it better, err edge.

I also heard, Canon is always present at major sports events and gave Loaner to problem bodies as well as for Lenses. Not sure how valid is this though.


Ducking for cover also !
BTW - nice pic Luis - but I dont think the 4 cameras plus L Lenses gave it justice.

_________________
Nikon D7000 and a bunch of Nikkors


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:43 pm
Posts: 631
Location: Portugal
It's not my photo. I've just added the credit for it on my previous post.

_________________
Nikon D90 + MB-D80 + SB-600 + AF-S VR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 + AF-S 35mm f/1.8 + AF 85mm f/1.8 | My photos on Flickr.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:37 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9784
Location: UK
Hi lowranking,

I think the first sentence in your quote belongs to the previous paragraph thus:
Quote:
The single best feature on this camera is the ergonomics. Everything is right where you want it, not buried in a menu bank! It is simple to use. This is a plus whether you are a pro or amateur.

If you have never owned a DSLR this might be a little over your head. Go with the D40x or D80. If you are thinking of upgrading....do it! You won't regret it.

Personally, I would place little credence in the opinion of an individual who believes that if you have never owned a DSLR you may be unable to appreciate good design and ergonomics.

Yes, I am sure the D200 can produce beautiful pictures with JPEG and no post-processing. That's not to say that pictures from any camera can't sometimes benefit from a little help after the event and sometimes it's the very best pictures that you might want to spend more time on.

While some professionals with very specific needs may be able to argue that Nikon is better for "x" and Canon is better for "y" I doubt that the rest of us with much more modest budgets will explore such limits. That's not to say that at the desired price point one may be naturally driven to one manufacturer over the others.

Bob.

_________________
OM-D E-M1 + ED 12-40mm f/2.8, H-F007014E, M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 45mm 1:1.8, M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 75mm 1:1.8, L-RS014150E.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 3662
I think that Canon has taken the lead among the pros because of better product design decisions that they made many years back and also their clever marketing.

_________________
Graham
Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9952
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Whenever I've spoken to pro sports photographers, they've always said the AF on Canons has been better - a combination of the body and a top lens.

Whether they've done much critical testing between the brands I don't know. There's also the fact Canon may offer better support in the field and at events. Who knows? But the fact is, you only have to attend or watch a few major sporting events to see Canon's dominance in this area. Look out for the tell-tale white lens barrels at the sidelines. And this isn't just in Canon's marketing photos - it's plain to see whether you're watching sports on the TV or in person.

On the other hand, many landscape and portrait photographers seem to prefer Nikon. Maybe the metering is better.

Pros are quite different photographers to enthusiasts though. Most don't pixel-peep or worry about noise or the features we all get excited about. They also rarely spend any time arguing or discussing the point in forums - for most of them it's not a hobby, but a job which requires a certain tool.

They just want a functional camera that delivers the required result in the conditions they work. If they find something which fulfils those requirements they're likely to stick with it for some time. So you may spot a pro using relatively old or unsophisticated kit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group