Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:49 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 32
This lense right here the Nikon-17-55mm-2-8G-ED-IF-Nikkor when or what kind of situations or events would you use this one for?

I just got a 50 mm 1.8 and happy with it.
I already have the VR 18-200.
Now I'm thinking of getting a lense that would be useful at night...but just mainly for family parties or gatherings. What would you guys recommend then? Situation: Regular party indoor/garden party at night with kids running around, guys having some drinks, girls chit-chatting, teen-agers dancing etc.... light situation I would say varies. Indoor lighting is bright, outdoor light i would is moderate to subtle to dim lighting.



In cases like this - What kind of wide angle lense would you recommend?

Thanks in advance...


Last edited by lowranking on Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:52 am
Posts: 344
Location: Sabah, Malaysia
Hi Lowranking
For night shots ? I thought your 50mm F1.8 would be able to cater this ?
If not wide enough, then the 18-200mm would be able to cater for this.
Perhaps, what you are lacking is a flashgun instead ?
:?:

_________________
Nikon D7000 and a bunch of Nikkors


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:17 pm
Posts: 411
Location: Colchester - UK
Personally, the 17-55mm 2.8 is stupidly expensive for what it is. I would say your money would be far better spent buying an SB600 or SB800 speedlight flash.

_________________
My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 3662
I've read that people are not happy with the quality of their 17-55 for the price that they've paid. I think I read that on this forum actually but I can't seem to find the thread. The Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 has gotten good reviews.

Wouldn't your 50 f/1.8 be better at low light than the 17-55? I think your 18-200VR would be better as well with it's VR, if not as good?

_________________
Graham
Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:17 pm
Posts: 411
Location: Colchester - UK
grahamnp wrote:
I think your 18-200VR would be better as well with it's VR, if not as good?


Well, yes and no. If he's planning on taking pictures of family/friends in low light situations then VR won't help very much. The 50mm f1.8 is better in low light but it probably won't be wide enough for a lot of indoor situations.

_________________
My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9952
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
PS - I took the Gallery for the D200 with the 17-55mm f2.8 if you're interested in some samples...

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/NikonD200/page5.shtml


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:17 pm
Posts: 411
Location: Colchester - UK
Gordon Laing wrote:
PS - I took the Gallery for the D200 with the 17-55mm f2.8 if you're interested in some samples...


So... worth it or not? You seem uniquely qualified to help answer his question, seeing as you've used the lens.

_________________
My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:32 pm
Posts: 9952
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
I'm afraid I only used it for those samples - I didn't run it through our whole suite of tests so can't really comment. It's a shame there's no VR on it, like Canon's EF-S 17-55mm f2.8... I guess it depends how much you want f2.8 in this range...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 32
You're all correct the 50 f 1.8 is extremely great... but you're all correct it's not wide enough...and unable to zoom.

What would you guys recommend then? Situation: Regular party indoor/garden party at night with kids running around, guys having some drinks, girls chit-chatting, teen-agers dancing etc.... light situation I would say varies. Indoor lighting is bright, outdoor light i would is moderate to subtle to dim lighting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:54 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9784
Location: UK
.
This isn't a lens I have any personal knowledge of but, for useful wide-angle capability and a relatively fast aperture, the Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical IF received a pretty favourable reviews here and here and is relatively ( :!: ) affordable.

Then there are the lenses mentioned in Gordon's Nikkor kit lens group test.

Bob.

_________________
OM-D E-M1 + ED 12-40mm f/2.8, H-F007014E, M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 45mm 1:1.8, M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 75mm 1:1.8, L-RS014150E.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:52 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7896
Location: Germany
Hello lowranking. You should look after a wider large aperture prime, like the Sigma 30mm/f1.4 or even better Sigma 28/f1.8 or Sigma 24mm/f1.8.
For parties: the wider, the better - plus high ISO, not flash!

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:03 pm
Posts: 89
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
The tamron 17-50 2.8 lens seems to have some poor QC. Some people get a great one and others get a really bad one.

_________________
rv65
C-5050Z | SD700IS (IXUS800 IS) | JamCam | Quantaray RZ 800 w/ 50mm prime lens (just found but broken) (aka Cosina CT-7, Various other brands) | EOS 50D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:13 pm
Posts: 384
Location: Florida, USA
I have used the 17-55mm but never owned it, it handles real well, but as for the price, it's pro caliber lens so if your doing it for a living it's worth it. Otherwise condiser a cheaper tamron 17-50 f/2.8.

Keep me posted! :D

_________________
Assistant News Photojournalist
Nikon and Canon Systems
A variety of f/2.8 lenses from 10.5 to 400mm
Support Cameralabs!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group