Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:26 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: D50 70-300 VR Voila
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:18 pm 
I finally got my Nikon D50. After being disappointed by Olympus, I decided to focus on attaining images I admired from other camera samples. Also, I knew I wouldn’t get that quality if I didn’t have a decent lens. This meant I would make some compromises, given my fragile budget. For image quality, I like Nikon’s D50/D70/D40, which all share the same Sony sensor. To my eye, these low pixel cameras produced better images than Canon’s CMOS, and even better than Nikon’s D80. The D70S was too expensive, and there were little things like the 1.1 USB transfer that turned me off. The D40 was a good option, but when I saw that the D50 accepted older auto focus lenses (without internal motors), I was hooked.

I lean toward nature photography, so when I read Gordon’s review of Nikon’s 70-300mm VR lens, which would give me an effective 450mm reach, I knew what I wanted. I was able to get a used D50 for $400 and the 70-300 for under $500 from Amazon. The D50 lacks some of the features of newer cameras but it is very solid and enjoyable to use. I have a little dust on the sensor/low pass filter, but it’s not bad enough to worry about now.

The 70-300mm with vibration reduction is wonderful. I found that the Normal anti-vibration setting was more effective than Active for hand held shots. Also, I’ve been pleasantly surprised that 300mm shots are every bit as sharp as 200mm shots, despite what the tests show. Also, there is absolutely no barrel creep (perhaps because it’s brand new), in fact it’s a bit stiff and jerky.

The D50’s view finder is bright enough to let you use manual focus, which can be really helpful peeping through foliage or fences where AF can’t go. The D50 only has a 5 pix burst and takes forever to reset, but the operation is smooth and a pleasure to use. The anti-shake rally works! So far, at 300mm, my tripod shots (with VR off) aren’t any better than hand held with VR on. I am somewhat disappointed in the low light images I’ve gotten, but that’s to be expected.

All in all, this the most fun I’ve had in a long time. I wish I had gone this route instead of the Oly E510 detour, to begin with, but then the allure of big pixel images and mega-options is hard to resist. A little experience has shown me that a good lens comes first. Put it on good sensor in a decent inexpensive camera, and with a little patience, voila, happiness happens.

I haven’t taken any shots in RAW format yet, but the images are small enough that my old computer can handle it, I hope. Most of these JPEGs have been slightly cropped, except for the train which has been tweaked every which way – all hand held, and most at 300mm.
Comments and questions are welcome.
ImageImage
ImageImage


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:36 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7937
Location: Germany
Congrats Brian. Your pics show what you can get with a decent lens on a not so up-to-date body. Very good choice indeed!
The train though seems to need a little more contrast...

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:47 pm 
Thanks Thomas, there's the original and one with a little more contrast.
ImageImage


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:49 pm 
those 2 of the ducks are really good


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:50 pm 
Thanks Rob, the VR on this lens is great for hand held shots.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:56 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7937
Location: Germany
What do you think, Brian: Is the improved contrast on the train a better choice?

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:59 pm 
My feeling is that it's overdone. My friend, sitting with me, agrees with you however, that the extra contrast is better. :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:09 pm 
Ok Thomas, I'm warming up to it. At first I liked the misty quality, but the extra pop from the increased contrast is nice.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:06 am 
Nice Shot Brian
I kinda like the misty look of the train though :roll:
Maybe I'm just old-fashioned.
Seeing your pics - I should have spent that extra for the 70-300mmVR instead of the 55-200mmVR ! Oh well - maybe next time I would be more wiser.. but the wallet seems to says otherwise ! :oops:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:20 am 
Hi David, I had sharpened and brightened that train so much already, I didn't think it could take any more, but Thomas' suggestion really does work if you want it to stand out. As for lenses, I found it hard to believe anything anyone said about them -- everyone said every lens was sharp. However, after reading Gordon's report, and photozone's, I took the chance. What they say about good glass seems to be true. After struggling with kit lenses, my conclusion was that glass was at least, and probably more, important than the camera.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:25 am 
Well Thomas, I posted the train picture to my blog today and guess which one I used... you guessed it, the one with more contrast. It just gets your attention better. Thanks


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:25 pm 
Nice shots brian.

Congrats on your purhcase!

I like the look of both pictures of the train. Although i agree the one with more contrast makes you want to look more intho the photo.

Jay


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:39 pm 
Thanks Jay. Yes, the extra contrast seems to have made all the difference. That little train has been running in the park since the late '60s, they sure keep it clean.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group