Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:12 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: d40 kits
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:06 pm 
Im getting ready to get my first dslr and im wondering which of these two kits you guys think would be better for me..


http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/5 ... amera.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/4 ... amera.html


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:11 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9822
Location: UK
Hi rob,

I hope you don't mind but I've moved this topic to the Nikon forum as it is Nikon specific and you'll get the best response here. Good luck.

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:43 pm 
go with the 18-135mm. That is a great lens for the price you are getting it for, normally it is $400. I would prefer it over a 55-200mm especially when it doesn't have VR.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:45 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7940
Location: Germany
Rob, don't go for the unstabilized 55-200mm! You'll regret it :?

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:52 pm 
I was thinking the same thing.. i think the 18-135 is built better too


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:19 pm 
The 18-135mm will allow you a great liberty in terms of focal length, while avoiding the problem associated with constantly changing lenses: dust.

Good luck with your new camera and share your photos with us! :)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:40 am
Posts: 1330
Location: Scotland
I agree with all you've heard so far. I use the 18-135mm with my D80 and it's a great lens.

Zorro.

_________________
http://zorrofox4.deviantart.com/

Image

Various lenses, SB800 & Manfrotto 190 with 460MG head


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:41 pm 
Well i'm glad everyone feels the same was as me.. it makes the decision a whole lot easier.. :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:15 pm 
Sorry for the double post but do you guys think it would be worth it for me to also buy a 55-200mm vr? I think i would mostly be using it for surf photography but i'm just not sure if the extra 65mm will make that much of a difference.. I would like to get the 70-300mm vr but it would be a while until i could afford that.. tell me what you think.. thanks


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:56 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7940
Location: Germany
Wait until you can aford the 70-300mm VR. It's well woth the wait over the 55-200mm VR:
- more reach!
- better IQ!
- less overlap with existing gear!

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:24 pm 
Thats kinda what I was thinking too.. Do you know if Nikon is planning to come out with any new lenses that might lower the price of the 70-300 ??


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:32 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 7940
Location: Germany
The following is pure speculation:
------------------------------
I think the 80-400VR is ripe for an update: the VR is outdated, the AF is outdated, the switch to MF is outdated but the optical formula is FF/FX-compatible and sharp (see my review here)! The sucessor would suprise me if it costs less than 1400$!!!
The 70-300m has non of the 80-400 faults. So I would not suspect the price to come under any kind of pressure!
So just be patient...

_________________
Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D800+assorted lenses


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:59 pm 
Do you think that thing is too big for the d40 to handle?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:33 am 
Definitely the 18-135. I have one and I think you will value the 18-135's extra reach. It's bigger than the 18-55 but I don't think it's too big for the body, not too heavy either. Do watch out for shake though.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group