Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:26 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:12 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9805
Location: UK
Hi folks,

Just a couple of shots at 24mm to get a thread for this lens started. They were taken last year when my 40D was very new. At the time I was still using an UV filter to protect the front of the lens. I have given up on that as, despite it being a fairly good one, I think any chromatic aberration in the corners of shots taken at 24mm is made slightly worse. The pictures were both taken without the benefit of a tripod (thank you "IS") and are clickable if so you can enjoy the full horror of pixel-peeping!
    24mm, f/5.6, 1/60 sec.
    Image
    24mm, f/9, 1/160 sec.
    Image

Finally, one at 28mm (post-processing described here)
    28mm, f/9, 1/160 sec.
    Image
Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 312
Location: Seattle (Home) ~ Taipei (Work)
Here's a few photos on the longer end of the 24-105 mostly to demonstrate the handholdability (a new word?) of the lens with IS on. Like Bob said, it will save you when you're shooting without a tripod.

Image
1/8th, 98mm @ f/4, ISO1000, IS on, handheld

Image
1/8th, 67mm @ f/4, ISO800, IS on, handheld

Image
1/10th, 102mm @ f/4, ISO1600, IS on, handheld

_________________
Leica M9, Nikon D300s, Leica X1, Canon S95, Zero Image 6x9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:06 am
Posts: 385
Location: Manchester (UK)
    105mm, f/5.6, 1/30 sec. ISO 100
    Image


Click image for 1024x683 version.

This is straight out of the camera... no post processing.

_________________
Canon EOS 400D, EF-S 18-55mm, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 MK I, EF-S 10-22mm, EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, EF 35mm f/2 IS, EF 85mm f/1.8
Canon 430EX II, Manfrotto 055CXPRO3, Arca Swiss P0
Panasonic GX1, Panasonic 20mm f/1.7, Olympus 45mm f/1.8
Canon EOS 30/33 and Pentax MX/ME Super

MY FLICKR!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:05 pm 
Fantastic bokeh from this lens!
Image

And Color!! Very little tweaking here, just added a little vibrance.
Image


Last edited by NurseDiesel1 on Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:51 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9805
Location: UK
Hi folks,

This photo was originally posted in the "Natural Landscape photography" section but it's just occurred to me that as the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is the kit lens for the 5D MkII it might be an idea to include it in this thread as an example of what the lens can do on a full frame body. I'll slap myself on the wrist for double-posting but excuse myself on the grounds that I haven't asked a question. ;)

The full size version is available by clicking the picture (7MB download) and it's only lightly cropped (5500×3516 from 5616x3744) so the twigs (nature's test card) in some of the corners give a good idea of what this lens is capable of at a benign f/8 and 24mm in combination with DPP's lens correction algorithms.

Image

5D MkII, ISO 100, f/8, 1/125th handheld with IS On, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 24mm

Canon's DPP software was used to do default de-vignetting and CA removal on the RAW file and the result exported as a 16 bit TIFF which was then loaded into Adobe Camera Raw for a few tweaks. Then Photoshop CS4 was used to remove a couple of plastic bottles from the river :roll: and to darken the sky slightly.

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:51 pm 
Camera: Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
Exposure: 0.025 sec (1/40)
Aperture: f/4.0
Focal Length: 24 mm

Image


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 207
Pretty fantastic if that left foot doesn't count.. :wink:

_________________
Canon 50D | 430 EX II | 50mm f/1.8 II | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | 17-50 2.8 VC |


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:06 am
Posts: 385
Location: Manchester (UK)
Inquisitive young chap (taken through car window, that was firmly closed in case he was a little peckish :wink: )

105mm at f/4, 1/80s, ISO 200

Image

_________________
Canon EOS 400D, EF-S 18-55mm, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 MK I, EF-S 10-22mm, EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, EF 35mm f/2 IS, EF 85mm f/1.8
Canon 430EX II, Manfrotto 055CXPRO3, Arca Swiss P0
Panasonic GX1, Panasonic 20mm f/1.7, Olympus 45mm f/1.8
Canon EOS 30/33 and Pentax MX/ME Super

MY FLICKR!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 10:43 pm 
I'm getting this lens for my 50D shortly. :)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 7:41 pm 
Well, I got it. :)

Image


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 10:20 pm 
Finally got it hen, eh! Anyway why the 17-40 and 10-22, and 24-105 whats that all about then? You planning on upgrading to full frame very soon, a 5D Mk II in the running? :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 11:57 pm 
10-22 for very wide stuff, then 17-40 for wide-normal and then 24-105 for normal zoom! :)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 11:04 am 
That seems rather excesive, as you could have saved so much money with not buying the 17-40, as IMHO thats a waste of money, because you are only missing out on 2mm between your 10-22 and 24-105, you should sell it and get some, primes, you'll have so much fun with something like a 50mm f/1.4 prime :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 2:13 pm 
Then again, it would mean having to change lenses.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 12:33 am 
nomix wrote:
Then again, it would mean having to change lenses.

Exactly.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group