Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:08 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:53 am
Posts: 87
Location: Northern Sweden
Just out of curiosity. How often do you guys/girls upgrade your camera bodies?

Im using my first DLSR baught 5 years ago or so, Samsung GX-20. I would like to go full frame some day. But having a new car + kids doesnt leave much money to be spent on camera equipment as much as I would like to.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:03 am
Posts: 1469
Location: Gold Coast Australia
For me, when the camera stops meeting my needs or when it’s worn out from to many clicks. :)

Cheers

_________________
Nikon D7000, Nikkor 80 - 400G, Nikkor 18- 200 VR II, f3.5-5.6.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 915
Location: SE Texas
The only camera bodies I have, that I bought new, are a Canon 7D, and a Nikon Coolpix A. I bought my 7D in 2010, and liked it enough that I bought a second, pre-owned 7D, to have matching bodies to use at work. These 2009-era cameras are working quite well; I feel no need to upgrade, as my employer does not have a need for large prints. (evidentiary photography, at night) Some newer Canon models may do better in low light, but I use powerful Canon Speedlites that negate any advantage a newer body may offer.

I could just as well have kept using my 40D for evidentiary shooting, but the 7D represented a significant step forward for Canon in Auto White Balance, which is very useful in mixed lighting conditions, so I do not regret the upgrade. In daylight, or when I can control the lighting, the 40D is still an excellent camera, and I plan to keep mine forever.

The Nikon A was released last year, but it being a fixed-lens compact, is not a replacement for a DSLR.

My wife feels no need to upgrade her camera. She shoots forensic/evidentary images with a Nikon D7000, which has been superseded by the D7100.

I have already started using "full-frame" DSLR cameras, for personal shooting, but I acquired them in pre-owned condition, at considerably less than half their original retail prices, after successors had been introduced. Of course, my D700 can be considered quite an upgrade to the Canon 7D, despite being an earlier-introduced model, but the point is that one need not have the latest, newest camera, nor is there a need to upgrade with each generation.

_________________
Canon 7D2/7D/5D/40D/1D2N; Nikon F6/D700/FM3A/1Dx/Coolpix A; Canon 40mm 2.8 STM, 135L, 50L, 35L, 50mm 1.8 I, 100mm 2.8L Macro, 10-22mm EF-S, 400mm 5.6L; Nikkor 50mm 1.2 AI-S, 50mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.8D, 16mm 2.8D Fisheye, 180mm 2.8D, 100-300mm 5.6 AI-S, 18mm 2.8D, 45mm 2.8 AI-P, Micro 60/2.8G; Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 915
Location: SE Texas
I just took delivery of an ancient Nikon D1x! I should start a local Canon/Nikon museum! :wink:

Actually, a large part of why I bought this quite old camera, is that it blocks less IR (infrared) than newer Nikon DSLRs, so I can dabble in IR shooting without committing to an IR-modified camera body, but some of the available-light images I have shot are actually quite pleasing. (I am awaiting delivery of my IR-pass filter.)

This does not mean I am opposed to upgrading cameras. I could certainly enjoy a D4s, D810, or 5D Mark III, but I will be upgrading lenses and flash first, and I want to see what direction my photogaphy will be going in the next year or two, as each of the cameras is best-suited to differing types of shooting.

_________________
Canon 7D2/7D/5D/40D/1D2N; Nikon F6/D700/FM3A/1Dx/Coolpix A; Canon 40mm 2.8 STM, 135L, 50L, 35L, 50mm 1.8 I, 100mm 2.8L Macro, 10-22mm EF-S, 400mm 5.6L; Nikkor 50mm 1.2 AI-S, 50mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.8D, 16mm 2.8D Fisheye, 180mm 2.8D, 100-300mm 5.6 AI-S, 18mm 2.8D, 45mm 2.8 AI-P, Micro 60/2.8G; Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:13 am
Posts: 14
Location: Dhaka
For me I am just so lazy to change or upgrade of any of parts of my camera. Whenever they get old I just replaced the camera with the new one!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8049
Location: UK
If we take "upgrade" as a direct replacement for something I already have... then not often. I got a 600D to replace a 450D. I'm now wondering when to get the 7D mk2 to replace the 7D. I will keep both as it is not worth selling the 7D. The 5D2... currently there are no plans to replace that. If Canon bring out a high MP body comparable in price to the D810, that could tempt me. Certainly I see no reason to look at the 5D3 or 6D.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D2, 7D1, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 10-18, 15-85
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 50/1.4A, 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Compacts: Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:23 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9833
Location: UK
.
Historically, quite often. My trajectory went Canon 400D (aka Rebel XTi), Canon 40D, Canon 5D MkII fairly rapidly but then I switched systems and downsized physically to the Olympus OM-D E-M5 when it was released, which I still retain as a second body, followed by the Olympus OM-D E-M1.

The E-M1 together with some of the better m4/3rds glass is as close as makes no difference to my perfect camera system, both ergonomically and technically. Gordon's review highlights its few weaknesses but, fortunately for me, non of them intersect with what I do with a camera. I still have a few lens purchases on the horizon, particularly the Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro when prices drop next year, but in some ways it's a relief to step off the camera body upgrade wagon, and cheaper too!

Bob.

_________________
Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8.
Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:22 pm
Posts: 1319
Location: Speyer (Germany)
Compacts:
2004 Dec: Sanyo Xacti J2 (defective)
2006: Sanyo Xacti S4 (used, still usable)
2009 Jan: Canon Powershot SX10 IS (sold)

DSLR:
2009 Jul: Canon EOS 500D (still usable and sometimes used)
2012 Aug: Canon EOS 5D Mark III

No reason to upgrade since then. :mrgreen:

_________________
Canon EOS 500D + Canon EOS 5D Mark III + Canon EOS 33v
Canon EF 28-80mm 3.5-5.6 USM + EF 24-105mm 4L IS USM + EF 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS USM + EF 50mm 1.8 II + EF 100mm 2.8L Macro IS USM + Sigma 12-24mm 4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM + Canon Speedlite 580 EX II + Nissin Speedlite Di 466


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 915
Location: SE Texas
Well, I just added a Canon 7D Mark II, which is the first time I have been an "early adopter" of a DSLR. I was going to wait until 2015, but then learned that this new camera could AF as low as -3 EV, which could very well make my job easier at times. (I shoot evidentiary/forensic images at night.) With the other AF advances, dual card slots, cleaner JPEGs at ISO 3200, and a menu that "knows" about RT flash, it seemed reasonable enough to buy now.

_________________
Canon 7D2/7D/5D/40D/1D2N; Nikon F6/D700/FM3A/1Dx/Coolpix A; Canon 40mm 2.8 STM, 135L, 50L, 35L, 50mm 1.8 I, 100mm 2.8L Macro, 10-22mm EF-S, 400mm 5.6L; Nikkor 50mm 1.2 AI-S, 50mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.8D, 16mm 2.8D Fisheye, 180mm 2.8D, 100-300mm 5.6 AI-S, 18mm 2.8D, 45mm 2.8 AI-P, Micro 60/2.8G; Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 SL II


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:02 am
Posts: 380
I've had 3 DLSR's total, but have 2 currently. I bought an entry level camera in 2010 and replaced it with a nicer one for the ergonomics in 2011. 2012, I added a full frame model. Both of my cameras were discounted due to newer models. It's been 2 years since, I don't have any plans to upgrade.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group