Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:28 pm

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:08 am 
Hi guys.
I don’t want to get into the Canon vs. Nikon discussion, I just want to talk about their product lines (excluding pro DSLR since I’m not really familiar with them).
It seems that Canon and Nikon product lines are not equivalent, in my opinion it is something like this (simple models at the top, advanced at the bottom):

Nikon D40
Canon 400D
Nikon D80
Canon 40D
Nikon D300

Nikon has 2 budget lines, while Canon has only one, as if Canon tries to make its entry level interesting enough for both new users and amateurs while Nikon separates these lines.
Nikon lines are straight forward, if you’re new to DSLR, buy the entry level. Serious amateur will buy the D80 and semi-pro the D300. In Canon, if you’re new or amateur you’ll buy the 400D, but serious amateurs will probably go for the 40D (and semi-pro users of course). So they are “pushing” serious amateurs into their semi-pro line. On the other hand, they supply a very good entry level camera (comparing to the D40) in a very reasonable price (comparing to the D80).
What do you think? What can be the reason / logic for this?
This is only my opinion, so no offence and feel free to disagree.


 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:35 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:30 pm
Posts: 9886
Location: UK
Hi Liron,

Don't forget that you can still buy the EOS 350D/Rebel XT so Canon does have two entry level models. I would guess that the 400D will pick up the role of the 350D once the 450D is released.


Sony RX1R II. Olympus OM-D E-M1 + M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8, M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 + 1.4x T/C, Lumix 7-14mm f/4, Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH, M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8
M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm 1:1.8, Leica D Vario-Elmar 14mm-150mm f/3.5 - f/5.6 ASPH.
OM-D E-M5, H-PS14042E, Gitzo GT1541T, Arca-Swiss Z1 DP ball-head.
Astrophotography: TEC 140 'scope, FLI ML16803 camera, ASA DDM60 Pro mount.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:20 am 
Hi Bob.
OK, you can still get the 350D, but you really think that this is a different line? I think the 400D replaced the 350D but you can still get the 350D as an older model.


 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:48 am 
If you look at the pricing, the Canon 400d sits somewhere between the D40 and the D80, although of course there's the D40x which is priced about the same as the 400d. I'm not sure how the D40x compares with the 400d though, other than it having the same megapixel count.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group