Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:42 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

sign the mount or print?
mount 20%  20%  [ 1 ]
print 80%  80%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:33 pm
Posts: 34
I am puzzled as to whether I should sign the mount or print itself. If I sign the mount then a customer can remove it - but do I really want this? I have seen other people's work where they have signed the actual print, artists do this so should we photographers?

S x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:52 pm
Posts: 574
Location: Scotland
If you want your signature to stay with the image then you have to sign the print. Other options would be to sign the back of the print if you feel the signature intrudes on the image or adding a watermark signature to the image in post processing that is part of the image every time a print is produced.

_________________
Nikon D90
Nikkor AF-S DX; 18-105 f/3.5-5.6G VR, 55-300 f/4.5-5.6G VR, 35mm f/1.8G
Speedlight SB-700

http://keystrokesukimages.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group