Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:56 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 243
Location: NB, Canada
Yup, you read the title right. My aversion for my 75-300mm keeps getting stronger, so I was looking for a way to measure it's suckiness, or at least to find out what it is, or isn't good for.

The idea I came up with, was to print out a lens test chart using my wireless Brother color laser printer MFC-9840CDW. Set @2400dpi, the chart came out pretty nicely. It doesn't compare to a 100-500$ professional chart, but I figured it was a start. The chart I got came from this website: http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/res-chart.html

I then set-up the camera with the 75-300mm on a stand, zoomed in @ 300mm, then moved the tripod so the chart would fill in most of the image. Then I took pictures at 75, 200, and 300mm. I noticed that I was doing a better job in MF compared to the AF, so I adjusted the focus on each shot manually, spending a few minutes each time to ensure I had the best image possible. Afterwards, I swapped lenses, but did not reposition the tripod or camera. That way I kept the same distance between the chart and my dSLR sensor throughout the test.

The main question I was trying to answer with these tests was whether or not it was worth keeping my 75-300mm, or just take the pictures with the 50mm f/1.8, and crop them.

Here are the results I got. The tests are somewhat subjective, but it can give an idea.

75-300mm @ f8 & 300mm: 1100 hor, 800 vert (average = 950)
75-300mm @ f8 & 200mm: 900 hor, 800 vert (average = 850)
75-300mm @ f8 & 75mm: 500 hor, 500 vert (average = 500)
50mm @ f8 & 50mm: 300 hor, 300 vert (average = 500)

If you do some calculations based on that:

@75mm, you get around 500/300 = 1.67 magnification. 50mm x 1.67 = 83mm
@200mm, you get 850/300 = 2.83 magnification. 50mm x 2.83 = 141.5mm
@300mm, you get 950/300 = 3.17 magnification. 50mm x 3.17 = 158.3mm

So, compared to a 50mm f/1.8, and with both of them opened up @ f/8, the 75-300mm III would work as a 83mm to 158.3mm. On the other hand, you can see just how terrible the lens can get between 200mm and 300mm, where you only get a gain of 141.5mm to 158.3mm.

What does all of this mean? If you are happy with the image quality of a 50mm f/1.8, and want to get the same IQ out of a 75-300mm, you need to treat it as a 83-158.3mm lens. So instead of having an image 6 times larger with your 75-300 @ 300 compared to a 50, you can only print an image 3 times larger. It's still a gain, so meanwhile it's still worth keeping it, but it's only a marginal gain.

Unless I can figure out why my flickr account doesn't let me upload fullsized images, meanwhile here's the link to the large version of these images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/51787685@N02/sets/72157626861453596/

Image
75-300mm III @ f8 & 300mm by Jean-Pierre La Forest, on Flickr

Image
75-300mm III @ f8 & 200mm by Jean-Pierre La Forest, on Flickr

Image
75-300mm III @ f8 & 75mm by Jean-Pierre La Forest, on Flickr

Image
50mm/1.8@f8&50mm by Jean-Pierre La Forest, on Flickr

I'm open to suggestions on how we could do an even better job at comparing how much better is the 200$ 75-300mm lens compared to the 99$ 50mm f/1.8, and if it's worth keeping.

_________________
Cameras: Canon EOS 6D, Canon EOS Rebel T3i, Canon EOS Rebel T2i, Canon S90
Lenses: Tamron: SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD, SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di VC USD, Rokinon: 8mm Fisheye cine, Canon: EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens, 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III, and EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Retired camera: Fujifilm Finepix s700


Last edited by Jean-Pierre on Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:52 am
Posts: 861
Location: Surrey, UK
A friends of mine has the 75-300 and I agree it is a really bad lens. I ended up with the Tamron 70-300 and it is quite a lot better. You aren't paying for the fact it is a canon lens and it doesn't have IS so this also keeps the cost down. These two lenses are the same price and because of that Tamron had a lot more to spend on making the image quality as good as possible. Since I only use it for sports IS is not necessary. If you wanted to upgrade consider the Canon 70-200 f/4L it's only £450 and is very good. Personally I would stay away from all of canons 75-300 and 70-300 range unless it's the 70-300L

_________________
Camera: Canon 550D with battery grip
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4L, Canon 50mm f1.4, Canon 18-55mm, Tamron 70-300mm,
Accessories: Manfrotto 055XPROB with 808RC4 head, Canon 430ex II speedlite, Lowepro Nova 180AW and Lowepro Pro Runner 450AW


Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks she’s a photographer -Stewie Griffin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 243
Location: NB, Canada
Yeah, the lens on top of my list as a replacement would probably be the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 for it's image quality, but right now even that is outside of my budget.

For now my biggest question was if the 75-300mm was even worth keeping. I would be curious to see how much better a 50mm f/1.2 or a Zeiss 50mm would do in this mash-up.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if with cropping you could get better / larger images with a 135mm prime lens than the 75-300mm.

_________________
Cameras: Canon EOS 6D, Canon EOS Rebel T3i, Canon EOS Rebel T2i, Canon S90
Lenses: Tamron: SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD, SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di VC USD, Rokinon: 8mm Fisheye cine, Canon: EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens, 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III, and EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Retired camera: Fujifilm Finepix s700


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group