Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:20 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:11 pm
Posts: 325
Location: Connecticut
Received my pre-order of this lens today from Adorama. Quite excited as it's the focal length I wanted, with the features I wanted at a price I couldn't resist.

First impressions from opening the box were pleasant. It's a relatively light lens, just slightly heavier and larger than the 50mm 1.8. It doesn't feel delicate but it's not nearly as rugged as Nikon's pro line-up. I apologize for not taking pictures of the lens itself, but I figure that those are easy enough to find online anyway.

Upon looking at the back of the lens the first thing that surprised me was the size of the rear element. Comparing it to my other DX lenses, it is noticeably larger, to the point where it compares to my full-frame lenses. The rear metal mount is a nice touch and just feels more authoritative when clicking into place than it's plastic mount brethren.

There is one lone switch on the lens to go back and forth from M/A (manual/auto) to M (manual only). This is a true AF-S lens, which means that it utilizes Nikons internal focusing motor in the lens for quiet operation and allows the use of manual override while auto-focusing. The focusing ring is decently damped, a bit more so than the 50mm 1.8 and much more so than comparable DX glass in it's price range like the kit lens and 55-200. It goes from it's minimum focus distance of 1 foot to infinity in a little less than one half turn of the ring. Another nice feature is that it doesn't have a hard stop to it's focus throw, so if you crank it too hard, it will just let you keep turning it without harming the focus ring.

The front element is a bit smaller than I had expected, but perhaps I'm not even sure what I was expecting because it's practically identical in size to the 50 mm front element. It is slightly recessed like the 50mm and comes packed with a lens hood. You'll be happy to find out that the lens hood is easily reversible, even with the lens cap on.

Time to crank this baby up and give it a whirl! Uh oh, crap. I forgot to charge my D80's battery... and it's back-up battery. Since I got this at lunch time and I wanted to rush out after work to take some pictures before the sun-set, I knew I couldn't come back home to grab it. So, instead I grabbed my charged up D40 to take on a shooting spree.

Honestly, one of the reasons I decided to purchase this is that I felt like it could be a perfect companion for my D40 when I just wanted to have something small and light to carry around while in a city or for snap-shots. I use my D80 the majority of the time, and of course I will use this lens with it, but there are times when you don't want to strap the backpack on with all your glass and tripod and just want to go light and shoot. So, in a way this was a good test run to see what the lens could do.

After a day of shooting with the lens, I can say that it's worth the admission fee. This is a fun lens in every sense of the word and it is responsive and takes some sharp shots. Even at 1.8, the shots are sharp and contrasty, but stopping down to f/2 thru f/4 gets you to some serious sharp territory. I did not honestly test apertures above f/8 much today since I went cavorting in the twilight woods with no tripod.

Here are the shots, they are all clickable to see the larger version. You can also find the original 100% full size version in my photostream if you so choose to pixel-peep them. Most of these shots are straight from the camera through Aperture with no PP done except tweaks to exposure. Contrast, sharpness and such are as is. Two photos have had some additional sharpening done to them because I wanted to see the outcome. These pictures will be noted as such.


1/2500s f/2.0 iso 200
Image

1/15s f/1.8 iso 250
This shot is here more to show off the way the rounded aperture blades handle specular highlights. As you can see, they are nice, round and plump.
Image

1/800s f/1.8 iso 200
This shot has some mild additional sharpening.
Image

1/200s f/4.0 iso 200
Image

1/250s f/2.0 iso 200
Image

1/80s f/8 iso 200
Image

1/4000s f/1.8 iso 200
Some mild sharpening done to the in-focus area of the wood.
Image

1/125s f/2.0 iso 200
Image

That's it for my informal review. Basically I could have just said "I like it, here are some shots, if you think you want it, then get it" but I decided to ramble on a bit about my opinions. Hopefully this helps someone, and I look forward to more thorough reviews to come.

_________________
Hardware: Nikon D80, Sigma 10-20mm, Nikon 18-55 mm VR, 55-200 mm VR, 105mm f/2.8D Micro, 35mm f/1.8G, SB-600, Manfrotto/Bogen 190CXPRO3 + 468MGRC2
Software: Aperture, Photomatix, GIMP

My Flickr Page


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 2069
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Hi thanks for the review and sample shots. what do you think about the bokeh? do u think it is smooth? or it could be smoother?

I think this lens is very sharp but in expense on the bokeh. What do you think?

_________________
RadiantLite - Cameras and Lenses Comparison Reviews, buying guide, photo taking techniques and other tips
My Portfolio - Some photos from my work


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:11 pm
Posts: 325
Location: Connecticut
Yes, I feel that the bokeh from this lens is very smooth. The rounded aperture blades give a smooth creaminess to the bokeh that I enjoy very much. Not as good as a 9 blade rounded lens but you cannot find a 9 bladed rounded design in close to the same price range.

This outperforms the 50mm 1.8D and 1.4D for bokeh performance in my opinion. Those produce the garish polygonal bokeh when replicating certain highlights. This is true for my 105mm 2.8D as well, which suffers from the same type of aperture blade design.

Even the sigma 30mm 1.4 has an 8 bladed design but they are not rounded, so will produce octagons for specular highlights.

The new 50mm 1.4G AF-S and the Sigma 50mm 1.4 both have 9 bladed rounded design for their blades, and combined with the extra focal length can produce more desirable bokeh. Of course, if you start talking longer focal lengths, then you will see better and better.

It is my opinion however, that for a $200 lens, this produces very nice bokeh and you would have to get up to about the $450-500 range to find a lens that is superior to it.

_________________
Hardware: Nikon D80, Sigma 10-20mm, Nikon 18-55 mm VR, 55-200 mm VR, 105mm f/2.8D Micro, 35mm f/1.8G, SB-600, Manfrotto/Bogen 190CXPRO3 + 468MGRC2
Software: Aperture, Photomatix, GIMP

My Flickr Page


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 3662
Thanks for sharing. Yea I find the 50 f/1.8 to have a very ugly bokeh. Do you know if this 35mm is sharper?

_________________
Graham
Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:11 pm
Posts: 325
Location: Connecticut
grahamnp wrote:
Thanks for sharing. Yea I find the 50 f/1.8 to have a very ugly bokeh. Do you know if this 35mm is sharper?


Stopped down to around f/2.8 to f/4, I'd say that they are very similar. However, I think the 35mm is sharper wide open at 1.8.

_________________
Hardware: Nikon D80, Sigma 10-20mm, Nikon 18-55 mm VR, 55-200 mm VR, 105mm f/2.8D Micro, 35mm f/1.8G, SB-600, Manfrotto/Bogen 190CXPRO3 + 468MGRC2
Software: Aperture, Photomatix, GIMP

My Flickr Page


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 2069
Location: Philadelphia, PA
yep for its price is deliver a lot of value.

_________________
RadiantLite - Cameras and Lenses Comparison Reviews, buying guide, photo taking techniques and other tips
My Portfolio - Some photos from my work


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group