Camera Labs

I thought they were a tough hard running side who never seemed to give up the chase even late into the game when it was obvious they had given their all and were out on their feet they were still da
Dao's mouth twitched for a second Quartes voice then drifted to his ears as words from Glenn's mouth reached him as well It didn't get loud at all; probably no one heard it But the purpose was serv
aggregation and flocculation of collided being constructed out of a very limited sub- and functions of the known ncRNAs
That would be awesome if Asta or someone else did it. And don't strain yourself thinking of lyrics for me, Tante. Just keep me in mind the next time you get inspired and go on a song-writing binge

_________________
Canon 40d w/ 17-85 F4-5.6 IS

Depends how wide you want to go!

28m on most cropped bodies will be equivalent to 42mm, so it'll be closer to a standard 50mm than a wide angle.

See our lens guide for examples and an explanation:

http://www.dslrtips.com/lens_guide/Lens ... uide.shtml

thanks that helped a bit. I am planning on getting the 17-85 is with my 40d but i was wondering if the 28-135 would be good. So 17-85 it is.

thank you Gordon.

- Jake

Hi Jake, the 17-85mm will give you wide angle coverage, but it depends if you want or need it. Many people are happy with the 28-135mm or the 24-105mm. Multiply the figures by 1.5 times and check out the example pics on our lens guide to see what you'd be getting...

so the 28-135 would give me about 42-203mm which is about standard up to a decent telephoto, the 24-105 would give me about 36-158 so again standard to tele. So for my everyday walk around lens i think i might just get the 28-135 be cause i don't really need the wide angle that the 17-85 gives and i would like a little bit of a tele photo. But i'm still not sure which one to get.

I say go for the 17-85mm just becuase the wider the angle the more fun you will have taking pictures.

_________________
Canon EOS 5D + 50mm f/1.8

http://flickr.com/photos/nathan_ward

yeah i have been thinking about it and i'm going to purchase the 17-85 instead of the 28-135 or any other lens, then i can get a telephoto of o fong my self needing one sometime in the future.

So thank you nathan

- Jake