Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:35 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:27 pm
Posts: 3
Looking for the next lens to add to my bag. Short range zoom with low-light capabilities. Anyone know the pros and cons? I read the reviews and think this might be the one. I think the price is good for what you get in this box.

_________________
Patrick Wallace
Canon XSi. 70-200 f4L USM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:52 am
Posts: 861
Location: Surrey, UK
The 17-50mm is a popular choice due to the fact it is cheaper than the canon alternative the 17-55mm. From the reviews I have read in the past the image quality is meant to be reasonably good although very soft in the corners wide open but get sharper when stopped down. The autofocus is pretty quick but will be a lot louder than the usual USM and no FTM. Some people find third party lenses to be not as accurate at focusing as the Canon lenses but in practice it is probably still good. I think the build quality is slightly lower than the 17-55mm, although it does include a lens hood out of the box. The VC is also loud but I would expect it to be relatively good performance wise.

Whilst this lens is clearly not the 17-55mm it is half the price. For around £300 you are getting a constant 2.8 lens with VC. As a result there are drawbacks so you will have to decide if you can live with them. Overall it is a great lens for the money, although I have heard the non VC version is sharper so it might be worth considering if the VC is essential... although it probably is :D

James

_________________
Camera: Canon 550D with battery grip
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4L, Canon 50mm f1.4, Canon 18-55mm, Tamron 70-300mm,
Accessories: Manfrotto 055XPROB with 808RC4 head, Canon 430ex II speedlite, Lowepro Nova 180AW and Lowepro Pro Runner 450AW


Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks she’s a photographer -Stewie Griffin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Posts: 920
Location: Kanduhar, Afghanistan
Make sure you read the correct reviews. There is a "VC" and "non-VC" model. Most everything that I have read says the VC has some issues and the "non-VC" is pretty good.

Non-VC http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-Lens-Review.aspx

VC http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-VC-Lens-Review.aspx

_________________
Mike "The Squirrel"
Canon 550D | Canon EF 35mm 1:2 | Canon 50 f/1.8 II | Sigma 18-125mm DC OS | Tamron SP 70-300mm Di VC USD | Canon 430EX II
Military Issued Canon 40D | Canon 55-250mm IS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group