Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 11:38 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:24 am
Posts: 4
can someone suggest me about EF-S 55-250mm or Canon EF 70-300mm?
Is there any great difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:58 pm
Posts: 822
Location: United Kingdom
The 70-300 has generally better IQ towards the edge of the frame IMO and with USM, it focuses more quickly too. IF you see yourself moving to a full-frame body, the 70-300 will still be compatible whereas the 55-250 will not.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not writing off the 55-250 as it's a competent lens but for the extra money, you arguably get a better lens with the 70-300.

If you decide to go for the 70-300, you may also want to consider the Tamron 70-300mm as it's reportedly even sharper than Canon's version.

_________________
DSLRs: Canon EOS 70D, 30D
Lenses: Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:06 am
Posts: 387
Location: Manchester (UK)
This question always worries me in case the 75-300 lens is being discussed.

the EF 70-300 has slightly better IQ and better Auto Focus motor than the 55-250.

Both are better than the 75-300 which to my mind is not worth buying.

I find the-digital-picture provides a good comparison of these lenses

_________________
Canon EOS 400D, EF-S 18-55mm, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 MK I, EF-S 10-22mm, EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, EF 35mm f/2 IS, EF 85mm f/1.8
Canon 430EX II, Manfrotto 055CXPRO3, Arca Swiss P0
Panasonic GX1, Panasonic 20mm f/1.7, Olympus 45mm f/1.8
Canon EOS 30/33 and Pentax MX/ME Super
Rollei 35S

MY FLICKR!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 2177
Location: The Netherlands
For the money, the 55-250 IS is a very good lens (as well as it's light-weight). Of course when spending more money you'll be getting better and sharper lenses, but then Id rather look at the mentioned Tamron instead!

_________________
Ruben

Panasonic DMC-FZ18, Panasonic DMC-FZ28, Canon G5, Canon 350D, Canon 50D + BG-E2N
Tamron 17-50 2.8, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM,
Canon 18-55 II plus lots of Minolta MD/M42 lenses and bodies


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:22 pm
Posts: 1315
Location: Speyer (Germany)
+1 for the Tamron. It's full frame compatible as well. In my opinion the full frame compatibility is getting more and more relevant as the old full frame cameras are getting into a realistic price range. (EOS 5D ~ 650€ / EOS 1D2 Mark II ~ 1000€)

_________________
Canon EOS 500D + Canon EOS 5D Mark III + Canon EOS 33v
Canon EF 28-80mm 3.5-5.6 USM + EF 24-105mm 4L IS USM + EF 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS USM + EF 50mm 1.8 II + EF 100mm 2.8L Macro IS USM + Sigma 12-24mm 4.5-5.6 EX DG HSM + Canon Speedlite 580 EX II + Nissin Speedlite Di 466


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group