Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:51 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 7997
Location: UK
I just produced the images, but haven't done a side by side comparison myself yet. We can do it at the same time :) I tend to write a lot, so if you're curious you can scroll down and check out the images. Then come back to find out how/why I got them.

Earlier today, on leaving for work in the morning I saw the moon out there staring at me. So I rushed back into my house, grabbed my camera gear, threw it (carefully) in the back of my car and set off for work. By the time I reached the car park, it was 8:20 already and I start at 8:30. Very little time to take some shots! So I very quickly fired off a load of shots using the Canon 100-400L lens by itself and with combinations of the two teleconverters handheld. With hindsight, I could have used my car as a makeshift rest, and maybe use RAW to help reduce the jpeg noise that will be seen in low contrast areas. I also think I should have tried some more settings. But it's too late now and I have what I have. AF only worked at 400, so I had to MF by eye at all other lengths. I might not have done the best job...

The two teleconverters are the Sigma APO 1.4x EX DG and the Kenko C-AF 2x Teleplus MC4.

First up, here are some resized shots to show the absolute difference in size, as well as 100% lossless crops. Lossless in the sense the jpeg data was cropped and not reprocessed and resaved. The settings may not be the same. Below present the best shots obtained for each length. I shot in aperture priority mode, whole scene metering at -1EV.

Image Image
400mm, 1/500s, f/8, ISO400

Image Image
560mm, 1/500s, f/8, ISO400

Image Image
800mm, 1/640s, f/11.2, ISO1600

Image Image
1120mm, 1/1000s, f/16, ISO3200

Next we have the various shorter length images upscaled in Photoshop by the nominal value, along with the actual 1120mm crop from earlier. (400x2.8, 560x2, 800x1.4, 1120x1)

Image Image
Left: 400mm, Right: 560mm

Image Image
Left: 800mm, Right: 1120mm

That's the data. I'm going to take a break before trying to figure out what, if anything, can be made out of it.

In case anyone looks at the EXIF, note that the Kenko 2x does not correct the aperture value so in those cases should be multiplied by 2 to get the correct value.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group