Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 3:08 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8032
Location: UK
It's all over the photo kit news today. Sigma announced they will soon start offering a service where they convert the lens mount for a fee. Only applies to their latest lenses and mirrorless ones.

While it is nice to have the option, I wonder how much use it'll get. For low value lenses you may just be better off replacing it. But it gives more options on higher value lenses if you change system. Are you that likely to change DSLR system though? While it addresses Sigma lenses, you may still have a load of other branded lenses.

About the only other possible benefit I can see is if you want to dabble with Sigma's own bodies and their Fovenon sensor. Get Sigma lenses for that, and if you later decide to end using the system you can convert the lenses into something more common without having to find another Sigma user to try and sell them onto!

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 3:58 pm
Posts: 9
Too bad Sigma or someone else doesn't build something like the older Tamron Adaptall 2 system for lenses. Buy the lens and corresponding mount and you're in business. Change bodies and get a new mount and you're again in business.

This would be a close second as long as it's economically viable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 8032
Location: UK
I think that would add complexity and cost to every lens, when few people rarely need it.

_________________
Canon DSLRs: 7D, 5D2, 1D, 600D, 450D full spectrum, 300D IR mod
Lenses: EF 35/2, 50/1.8, 85/1.8, 135/2+SF, 28-80 V, 70-300L, 100-400L, TS-E 24/3.5L, MP-E 65, EF-S 15-85 IS
3rd party: Zeiss 2/50 makro, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300 f/2.8 OS, Celestron 1325/13
Tinies: Sony HX9V.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 3:58 pm
Posts: 9
I agree, that's why I mentioned it being economically viable. If it's too costly then people wouldn't buy it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group