Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:21 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 199
Location: Cleveland, England
Hi,

I did my first photoshoot last week with a good friend of mine, she was willing to help me and it was a nice trip out. I've found that i'm not very good with directions, so I generally told her to stand and look natural. I think it turned out nice! The first photo was in the May Assignment, so some of you may recognise it. All straight out of the camera with a few adjustments to levels and the usual resize+sharpen for the web.

Here's the shots:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Kind Regards,
Jack

_________________
Jack McIntyre
17, NE England, Student.
Canon EOS 350D + BG-E3 - EF-S 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 - Canon 70-200 F/4L!.
www.imagetwist.co.uk
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackmcintyre - Wildlife Photostream


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:28 pm
Posts: 1065
Location: Syracuse, NY
Jack, Jack, Jack! I really love every last one of these man!

I really like the last one a lot, love the colors, but in number 3, your model there looks a little stoned. But I do love the colors.

Jake

_________________
Jake O'Connell, 40D Crew
Canon EOS 40D | 28-135mm IS | 50mm f/1.8 |Vivitar DF 383 | Vivitar 285hv
My Flickr
my Blog
"Photography isn't so much about the results as it is the collective experience, your interactions with people and with the world"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:49 am
Posts: 1909
Location: London, UK
Jack,

Thanks for sharing your images with us. Let me give you a precis of what I found.

Image 1: It's definitely thoughtfully composed, and the exposure is perfect. What I'd query is why a central framing (I'd have gone with a third line), and the relevance of the sign to the subject.

Image 2: The warm white balance works, whether it be intentional or not. It's another central framed image, which doesn't work here. The pose is also seemingly unnatural to my eye. For these reasons, I'm not sure what to recommend on this one.

Image 3: Much better than image 2. The pose still feels a little forced (i.e. static) to my eyes. There are some good textures around her to keep interest. For a more dynamic image I'd have instructed her to look over her right shoulder.

Image 4: Composition, exposure and camera control are good. The best of all your images here. However the pose is still static. I would have asked her to place her hands in her pocket and then with feet pointing away from the camera, I'd have her turn her torso obliquely to the camera so that her face in in the image; this again adds dynamism.

Image 5: Interesting, and good use of third lines. The only other comment I can make are there being too many focal points - the dandelion, the lip stud and the nostril. My eye doesn't fixate on one spot. DoF would be something to explore.

Hopefully there's something within there that you can take away.


Very briefly as you tell us you're "not very good with directions". Direction is one very important skill to have with portrait and people photography. That or having a good model who knows what to do. To pick up a little in the way of understanding directions, let yourself be photographed. The experience of being on the other side of the camera will make you appreciate the modelling aspect more, and make it easier as a photographer to know what to demand.

All the very best.

_________________
Nikonian

http://www.edtangphotography.com
http://journeysintophotography.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:43 pm
Posts: 631
Location: Portugal
Well, in my opinion, portraits are all about the eyes. Try a couple of shots with this approach and see how that works for you.

_________________
Nikon D90 + MB-D80 + SB-600 + AF-S VR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 + AF-S 35mm f/1.8 + AF 85mm f/1.8 | My photos on Flickr.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 199
Location: Cleveland, England
Thanks for the comments everyone!

Photoj - thanks a lot for your comments, it will help a lot. Just a quick response to what you said about the first picture, the angle doesn't help but where the grass ends is about a 30 foot drop down onto the beach. I used a center line to make it look symmetrical, I just thought it looked better on site.

_________________
Jack McIntyre
17, NE England, Student.
Canon EOS 350D + BG-E3 - EF-S 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 - Canon 70-200 F/4L!.
www.imagetwist.co.uk
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackmcintyre - Wildlife Photostream


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:30 am
Posts: 2370
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Just a comment on the first one, give it a square crop and it will look alot better. Square crops work better with objects in the center. Try that out and post the results here.


I will comment this as well later on in a hurry right now!

_________________
My Picasa

My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:02 pm
Posts: 68
Location: Belgium
I like them,
just a stupid suggestion, in you first shot, in stead of standing on the groudn why didn't you put/lift her on top of the sign... nevermind :)

I don't like the frontal shot when she is sitting on the rocks... maybe if you blurred out the background ( aperture really small - or photoshop ), and me personally, I don't mind the subject looking directly in the lens.

Great work!

_________________
Nikon D80, Nikon F60
18-55, 55-200 VR, 50mm 2.0, 35-135mm 3.4-4.5
www.flickr.com/photos/palieter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:49 am
Posts: 1909
Location: London, UK
Palieter wrote:
...maybe if you blurred out the background ( aperture really small - or photoshop )


Rookie errors here. Small f stop/number = large aperture or fully blown aperture = short DoF. A small aperture = large f stop/number

Photoshop for blurring...not that I have anything against PP, but that's not advice I'd like to hand out. DoF is something that ought to be captured in camera. The aperture suggestion was good though.

_________________
Nikonian

http://www.edtangphotography.com
http://journeysintophotography.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 199
Location: Cleveland, England
Photoj wrote:
Palieter wrote:
...maybe if you blurred out the background ( aperture really small - or photoshop )


Rookie errors here. Small f stop/number = large aperture or fully blown aperture = short DoF. A small aperture = large f stop/number

Photoshop for blurring...not that I have anything against PP, but that's not advice I'd like to hand out. DoF is something that ought to be captured in camera. The aperture suggestion was good though.


Possibly he wasn't sure on the right words for the Aperture? Its sometimes confusing to people who don't speak native english to maybe say that when a number gets smaller the actual aperture gets bigger.

Or, rookie mistake. :wink:

_________________
Jack McIntyre
17, NE England, Student.
Canon EOS 350D + BG-E3 - EF-S 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 - Canon 70-200 F/4L!.
www.imagetwist.co.uk
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackmcintyre - Wildlife Photostream


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:11 pm
Posts: 325
Location: Connecticut
I'm confused on how you would lift her up onto that sign. It's not exactly a short sign and doesn't look like it would be terribly comfortable to sit on.

I personally like 1 and 5 the most. Although, I would have been tempted to crop out the nostril in #5. :)

_________________
Hardware: Nikon D80, Sigma 10-20mm, Nikon 18-55 mm VR, 55-200 mm VR, 105mm f/2.8D Micro, 35mm f/1.8G, SB-600, Manfrotto/Bogen 190CXPRO3 + 468MGRC2
Software: Aperture, Photomatix, GIMP

My Flickr Page


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:02 pm
Posts: 68
Location: Belgium
First of all: I'm not a rook, I'm more a novice

Aperture: I don't think I used the wrong words, I think you misunderstood there... so to make sure i.e. f/2 means the iris opening is bigger than in f/4! OK?

And second of all, I didn't say it was gonna be easy fitting the girl on top of the sign :):):) Why would you want it to be easy anyway

_________________
Nikon D80, Nikon F60
18-55, 55-200 VR, 50mm 2.0, 35-135mm 3.4-4.5
www.flickr.com/photos/palieter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 199
Location: Cleveland, England
Palieter wrote:
First of all: I'm not a rook, I'm more a novice

Aperture: I don't think I used the wrong words, I think you misunderstood there... so to make sure i.e. f/2 means the iris opening is bigger than in f/4! OK?

And second of all, I didn't say it was gonna be easy fitting the girl on top of the sign :):):) Why would you want it to be easy anyway


Yeah you are right saying that the iris is wider on F/2 than F/4, but in the original post you said make it smaller. We assumed you meant make the iris smaller, not the number. :roll:

_________________
Jack McIntyre
17, NE England, Student.
Canon EOS 350D + BG-E3 - EF-S 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 - Canon 70-200 F/4L!.
www.imagetwist.co.uk
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackmcintyre - Wildlife Photostream


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:49 am
Posts: 1909
Location: London, UK
Palieter wrote:
Aperture: I don't think I used the wrong words, I think you misunderstood there... so to make sure i.e. f/2 means the iris opening is bigger than in f/4! OK?


f/2 is indeed larger than f/4, but I'm afraid you did use the wrong words to describe aperture, and that's where confusion's occurred. Wrong aperture terminology use is an error in many beginner and enthusiast photographers that I've come across.

_________________
Nikonian

http://www.edtangphotography.com
http://journeysintophotography.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:48 am
Posts: 2879
Location: Nikonia California
beautiful shots...

...however you need to work on giving your model some instructions..

given the right instruction your photos could be more powerful and your model could look much better..

certain shots don't really do her justice...

like in shot number 3...

u could've had her hide that lil muffin top away and fix her shoulders...


i'm new at this also so if i'm giving the wrong advice pls correct me.

_________________
WHO I AM BLOG, WHAT I DO BLOG
Facebook
*most of my photos nowadays come with a blog post. Please take some time and stop by :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 2069
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Agree. model needs serious direction / pose

Where is the eyes? Portrait is about eyes :D focus on the eyes :)

The things that work is color and exposure.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group