Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2014 2:03 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Digg'n for Treasure
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:00 am
Posts: 453
Location: Canada
tring something new hope you like it (not sure if i do but the childrens mom sure did)

[url][url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/28251536@N02/5621762339/]Image[/url]
DSC_7603a by darthkindy, on Flickr[/url]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:36 am
Posts: 620
Location: Toronto, ON
Darth, pardon my frank comment here, but the post-processing looks Bad.

Let me be clear: I think you have a great moment captured in your photograph, but your... technique... has buried that moment under a bunch of Photoshop "crud". Just because you can edit something in a funky way doesn't mean you should. I was replying to your Glamour Shot thread but my iPhone ate the post - I was saying that the processing was overdone in that photo and that it took away from the overall image (although not to the same extent as here).

Mom may like it, but she's going to love most any photo of her kids - Photoshop or not.

Can you post an un-processed version here? Don't get caught up in using a "technique" to make your photos stronger... Often subtle processing does more for a photo than heavy-handed types.

_________________
Canon EOS 5D MkII | Canon EOS 7D | Canon Digital Rebel XSi | EF 35mm f/1.4L | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | EF 85mm f/1.8 | EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | EF 135mm f/2L | EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 580EX II | LumoPro LP-120

My Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:25 pm 
I agree 100% with Plymer. Less is more when it comes to photoshop.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:27 am 
absolutely raped the image here. I understand the technique you were going for but there is no nice way to put it. It is just over processed but not in a good way. Maybe this is the wrong type of subject for this type of processing. IMHO


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group