Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:28 pm

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:31 pm 
After receiving a new Sony A100 I have been having a little look at glass available.

I have heard about this 18-250 lens that may be available soon and looking at the sony 18-200 lense. At the same time I have seen more specific length lens's such as the 70 - 300 and 11 - 18 lens.

What is the best to go for, a single lens with a nice range or multiple lens's which have a more specific range? Are there any pro's and cons between these two options? I like the idea of one lens that does everything but wondering what the cons are if any

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:05 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:08 pm
Posts: 8003
Location: Germany
Toby, there is one simple difference:
Lenses with shorter zoom-range can be better in the IQ-department.
This is not to say that they must be better, so watch out for actual lens-test before you decide, if you're interested in the highest IQ.
Otherwise there have been some quite good designs with 11x zooms, esp. the Nikkor VR 18-200 :D :D :D

Thomas (beware: Nikon-fanboy and moderator!) My Lens Reviews, My Pictures, My Photography Blog
D810+assorted lenses

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:30 pm 
I have read that the 18-250 is better than the Tamron equivalent which sounds very promising. But super zooms comes at a price, at tests they are soft at specific focal lengths, distorted and they are slow (small aperture) compared to more serious lenses. Those factors might not be an issue for you?

I would recommend multiple lenses and if you want to supplement you kit lens try a 50/1.7 and 70-210/4 (beercan) combination from Minolta (can be bought second hand). The latter should be better than the 70-300 from Sony.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:11 am 
70-300G SSM will be a good choice if you already have the A100 kit lens. But if you don't, get the 18-250. The focussing speed is very fast for a superzoom lens although the small aperture. If you have the money, get the CZ16-80 and 70-200G SSM f2.8 . It's the best combo

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:38 pm 
I bought the 18-250 in December and absolutely love it. The only time I've taken it off is for low light where I use my Sigma 24-60mm 2.8 or 50mm 1.7. It's an incredible lens especially for its price. Little CA compared to my 75-300 and a very solid design. For a walkaround lens it can't be beaten IMO. Focusing is also very very fast, much better than my 18-200 Sigma and my 75-300 Sony. I wish they'd do a review of it here soon as it is unmatched and gives Sony a huge advantage to its competition in that space.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group