Camera Labs

c and c welcome.

sony doesn't sucks

Cameras seldom suck, photographers mostly do.
Speaking from personal experience.

Nobody said they suck, they just said other brands have a stronger lens line-up and better high iso noise performance and perhaps better ergonomics. Nice shots

_________________
I've upped my Iso, now up yours.
Nikon D700, Nikon D80, Micro Nikkor 105 f2.8 AI-S,Nikon 85mm 1.8D, Nikon 50mm 1.8D, Nikon 35mm F2D, Nikon 16-35 f4 VR, Nikon 24-70mm F2.8 AF-S, Nikon 70-200VRII, Nikon 70-300mm VR, 300mm f2.8 AI IF ED, SB-800, SB-900. Noiseware pro,NIK Dfine, Nik Colour Effex, Nik Sharpener Pro

I do believe you i always sucks!...

_________________
Good Aperture Everyone! Good reply is always Making me very very happy thanks...
Sony A700; sony 18-70mm, 18-250.
My flickr!! http://www.flickr.com/photos/loymercs/
My Blog!! http://loymercsclick.blogspot.com/

Nice shots mate! I like the DoF and highlights on the glass! Great work!

- Bjorn -

_________________
Street and documentary photographer | Google+ | Twitter | Tumblr

Leica M9-P (my article on Camera Labs) | Leica D-Lux 5 | 50mm Summilux

thanks Bjorn, those we're some of the first pictures that i've taken with my A350, thanks for the comments!

not much post proccessing was done, just with the supplied software, some sharpening and some minor adjustments we're done.

Wich objective have you used?

hi cartong, if you're asking me what my subject is- those are chandeliers, taken while strolling on a mall, saw those hanging on a shop, so ive taken some snaps. taken with my a350 with the kit lens.

I meant what kind a lens has been used But as you just said, it's the kitlens

Hi, yes Sony is great! hehehe

about your photos, I am pretty confused on what you try to capture.

For the chandeliers, I don't know where is the point of interest/dominant element that you want to convey. Also a big portion of the image is out of focus. Moreover, the background is very distracting.

That is my initial impression and I hope it could help.

_________________
RadiantLite - Cameras and Lenses Comparison Reviews, buying guide, photo taking techniques and other tips
My Portfolio - Some photos from my work

I got the A350, and really happy with it, I was going to get the 900 but since I'm kinda new with the digital reflex I wanted to start on a easy slop... but who knows maybe in a year or 2 I might get something better. Sony is great even the PS3, that I use for slideshows on my big full HD TV... Cheers to ya'll

I have a 350 and its great with old Minolta Glass. I have the Sony 18-200mmDT zoom for a walkaround and it does great. I didnt like Canon becauise of the plasticky feel and both the Canon and Nikon, I dont want to spend a fortune on image stabilized lenses. I am waiting for the Sony A950 or 1000 with the new Exmor sensors and I would like to get one eventually. Funny that Kodak makes cheap cameras, but Hasselblad uses its 50 megapixel sensor for its high end cameras! When all sensors are full frame and they finally figure out which sensor works the best then It will be time to buy a higher end Sony camera. Seems like every 6 months cheaper cameras are coming out with better sensors.

For many people, the camera brand loyalty is, well, pretty similar to PC vs Mac loyalties.

Sony, although catching up fast, is still a distance behind Canon and Nikon. This leads to much less third party lens and accessories support.

_________________
AntBlog701 | SillyDog701
Apple: MacBook Air (11-in, 1.8GHz i7), Mac Pro (12-core 2.66GHz), MacBook Pro (15-in), iMac (21.5-in, Core i5), Mac mini Server (2.66GHz), iMac (24-in, C2D), PowerBook G4 (12-in, 1.33GHz), iMac G4 (1.25GHz)x2, PowerMac G4 (dual 1.44GHz), iPhone 5, iPhone 4S, 4, 3G, iPad 4, iPad 3, iPad 2, iPad, iPad mini (all 64GB, LTE/3G), iPod touch (4th gen & 1st gen), 3 x AirPort Extreme, Time Capsule...

Dont think Sony is behind. Sony sensors are being adopted by Nikon and are going to exmor sensors. Kodak is a cheap camera, but tell me why Hasselblad is using their 50megapixel sensor for their highest end camera!
According to German photo magazine, Foto Magazin, the future Nikon D3x pro SLR camera will be fitted with the Sony image sensor that was presented a few months ago and that is expected to appear on the Sony Alpha 900 camera (high-end D-SLR from Sony). If this is confirmed, it would mean that the Nikon D3 will have a successor under the name of Nikon D3X (or D4) and that the Sony sensor is really of the utmost quality.

We knew that it was coming with 25 million pixels, but it could have been short on quality compared to the D3 (or D700) sensor because of its small (but many) pixels. For Nikon to accept to use this Sony sensor (and not a better one) at this level of products, they must be sure to have the best possible silicon piece: Pros want wonderful images, not only big figures (a big bunch of pixels).
PICTURE BELOW TAKEN WITH ALPHA 350 CAMERA OF MY 16YEAR OLD NIECE IN HER PROM DRESS.