Free Shipping on ALL Products
camera reviewsbest cameraslens reviewsphotography tipscamera forumvideo toursphotography bookssupport me
It is currently Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:42 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: sony 75-300m - worth it?
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:57 pm 
hi, i have a sony a300 and need a second lens. i was just wondering what my next lens should be and whether the 75-300mm telephoto zoom lens is worth getting for my second lens. for the price. and whether its a good buy or if i should invest in something better.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2009 4:58 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:30 pm
Posts: 6953
Location: The Netherlands, Ridderkerk
Hi jrunner! Welcome to the Camera Labs forum and welcome to the Sony community! Good to have you on board!

The 75-300mm has gotten reviews that are not all too positive. You may be better of buying a third party equivant, like a Sigma or Tamron lens. Also, you might want to hold back and see whether the rumoured Sony 70-300mm, with a build-in SAM focussing motor is something you'd like. There's no known date for that just yet, but given it's been leaked on official Sony websites already, it should arrive soon.

And as with most things: you'll get what you pay for. The 75-300mm is a cheap lens, and while you'll be able to shoot great photos with it, with useable quality, you'll find better IQ with lenses that cost a little more.

- Bjorn -

_________________
Street and documentary photographer | Google+ | Twitter

Leica M9-P (my article on Camera Labs) | Leica D-Lux 5 | 50mm Summilux


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 6:36 am 
Minolta 100-300mm APO is better than most cheap xx-300mm. Find one on ebay. 70-210 F4 (beercan) is even sharper; though unlike APO it suffers from CA. If you have more money, get 70-300mm G


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:19 pm 
I got the sigma, and it would be nice to have a side by side (sony vs sigma). The reason I bought the sigma, was it's look and price (sigma looks better) and it was on sale. So far I cannot say anything bad about it... and I'm certain the sony would be as good (but it's a 75-300mm).


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.
/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs

Webdesign by Alphabase IT
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group