Support Cameralabs by shopping at our partner stores or donating via Paypal
 

Follow me!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Gordon Laing and Cameralabs on Google+
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter

 
  Latest camera reviews

Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon 100HS / 115HS
Canon 300HS / 220HS
Canon S100
GoPro HD Hero 2
Canon 510HS / 1100HS
Canon 310HS / 230HS
Canon SX150 IS
Olympus E-PL3
Canon SX40 HS
Sony NEX-C3
Panasonic GF3
Fujifilm HS20 EXR
Panasonic FZ150
Olympus E-P3
Panasonic FZ47 / FZ48
Nikon COOLPIX S9100
Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
Sony Cyber-shot HX9V
Panasonic FX77 / FX78
Canon SX230 HS
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Panasonic Lumix G3
Sony Cyber-shot TX10
Canon 500HS / 310HS
Nikon D5100
Sony Cyber-shot W510
Nikon COOLPIX L24
Canon PowerShot A1200
Panasonic FS18 / FH5
Canon PowerShot A800
Panasonic TZ18 / ZS8
Canon PowerShot A3300IS
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Panasonic TZ20 / ZS10
Canon IXUS 1000/SD4500
Sony Alpha SLT-A33
Panasonic Lumix GH2
Nikon D7000
Canon PowerShot G12
Canon PowerShot S95
Panasonic Lumix LX5
Nikon D3100
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D
Nikon D300s
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Nikon D90

All reviews ....
 
 
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
   
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikkor lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi kit lens upgrade group test Gordon Laing, September 2006 / updated July 2007

Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi lens group test coverage, wide angle


One of the major reasons for buying a new lens is for a broader or alternative focal range. In terms of written specifications, the EF-S 17-55, EF-S 17-85 and EF 17-40mm all sport slightly wider coverage than the kit EF-S 18-55mm, while the 17-85mm enjoys a longer reach. The EF 17-40mm is clearly shorter than the kit lens when zoomed-in.

To compare their actual coverage in real-life we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other from a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their widest focal lengths. Results for all four lenses are pictured below.

With all images opened alongside each other in Photoshop, the EF-S 17-55mm and EF 17-40mm both capture a fractionally wider field than the EF-S 18-55mm as expected, although interestingly the EF-S 17-85mm squeezes slightly more in than any of them; this is apparent even on our shrunken examples below.


 

Canon EF-S 18-55mm
Canon EF-S 17-85mm
Canon EF-S 17-55mm
Canon EF 17-40mm
Canon EF-S 18-55mm at 18mm   Canon EF-S 17-85mm at 17mm   Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 17mm   Canon EF 17-40mm at 17mm
18-55mm at 18mm (29mm equiv)
17-85mm at 17mm (27mm equiv)
17-55mm at 17mm (27mm equiv)
17-40mm at 17mm (27mm equiv)


Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi lens group test coverage, telephoto

Next up came the telephoto-end of each lens. Again to compare their actual coverage in real-life we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other from a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their longest focal lengths. Results for all four lenses are pictured below.

Here the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm is clear, and gives it greater compositional versatility than the pair which top-out at 55mm, and over twice the reach of the EF 17-40mm.

So in terms of coverage, only the EF-S 17-85mm offers a significant benefit over the kit EF-S 18-55mm lens. The EF-S 17-55mm delivers virtually the same range, while the EF 17-40mm is noticeably shorter.



 
Canon EF-S 18-55mm
Canon EF-S 17-85mm
Canon EF-S 17-55mm
Canon EF 17-40mm
Canon EF-S 18-55mm at 55mm   Canon EF-S 17-85mm at 85mm   Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 55mm   Canon EF 17-40mm at 40mm
18-55mm at 55mm (88mm equiv)
17-85mm at 85mm (136mm equiv)
17-55mm at 55mm (88mm equiv)
17-40mm at 40mm (64mm equiv)

Image Stabilisation

The EF-S 17-55 and EF-S 17-85mm lenses both feature Image Stabilisation (IS) facilities which greatly reduce the risk of camera-shake. This allows you to shoot under much lower light conditions without needing a tripod, or increasing the sensitivity and compromising noise levels as a result.

Both lenses claim up to three stops of compensation, which should allow you to use shutter speeds up to eight times slower than before. For example, if the slowest exposure you could confidently handhold at a certain focal length was, say, 1/60 of a second, three stops of compensation should enable you to enjoy the same result at 1/8 (or more accurately, 1/7.5).

As with all anti-shake systems, the effectiveness of IS varies between photographers and the particular shooting conditions, but its benefits are clear. We found they allowed us to handhold much slower exposures than before and eliminated camera-shake on virtually all images. Image Stabilisation is a great reason to upgrade from the EF-S 18-55mm kit lens. For examples of Image Stabilisation in practice, see our Canon 17-55mm and Canon 17-85mm reviews.



Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


Canon EF-S 17-85 IS USM


 



 



All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2012 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ How we test / Best Cameras / Advertising / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs