Support Camera Labs by price checking using the flags below



Follow us!
Camera Labs RSS Feed
Camera Labs on Facebook
Camera Labs on Twitter




Latest camera reviews

Sony Cybershot DSC-W220
Canon PowerShot G11
Canon IXUS 95 / SD1200IS
Canon EOS 7D
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Olympus 'PEN' E-P1
Nikon D3000
Canon PowerShot SX120IS
Panasonic Lumix TS1 / FT1
Canon PowerShot D10
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
Nikon D300s
Panasonic Lumix FS25
Panasonic Lumix FZ38 / 35
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony Cyber-shot W270/290
Canon PowerShot A2100IS
Sony Alpha DSLR-A380
Canon IXUS 980 / SD990IS
Nikon D3x
Panasonic Lumix GH1
Sony Cyber-shot HX1
Olympus E-620
Nikon D5000
Canon EOS 500D / T1i
Canon PowerShot SX200IS
Nikon COOLPIX P90
Canon IXUS 100 / SD780IS
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 / ZS3
Panasonic Lumix G1
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Canon EOS 50D
Nikon D90
Panasonic Lumix LX3
Canon EOS 1000D / XS
Nikon D700


All reviews ....
   
 
  Best Buys: our top models
     



Compacts / Super-zooms
Budget DSLRs / Mid-range DSLRs / Semi-pro DSLRs
   
 



   
 



Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join our Forum and let everyone know.
   
 
  DSLR Tips



 
Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi kit lens upgrade group test Gordon Laing, September 2006 / updated July 2007

Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi lens group test coverage, wide angle


One of the major reasons for buying a new lens is for a broader or alternative focal range. In terms of written specifications, the EF-S 17-55, EF-S 17-85 and EF 17-40mm all sport slightly wider coverage than the kit EF-S 18-55mm, while the 17-85mm enjoys a longer reach. The EF 17-40mm is clearly shorter than the kit lens when zoomed-in.

To compare their actual coverage in real-life we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other from a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their widest focal lengths. Results for all four lenses are pictured below.

With all images opened alongside each other in Photoshop, the EF-S 17-55mm and EF 17-40mm both capture a fractionally wider field than the EF-S 18-55mm as expected, although interestingly the EF-S 17-85mm squeezes slightly more in than any of them; this is apparent even on our shrunken examples below.


 

Canon EF-S 18-55mm
Canon EF-S 17-85mm
Canon EF-S 17-55mm
Canon EF 17-40mm
Canon EF-S 18-55mm at 18mm   Canon EF-S 17-85mm at 17mm   Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 17mm   Canon EF 17-40mm at 17mm
18-55mm at 18mm (29mm equiv)
17-85mm at 17mm (27mm equiv)
17-55mm at 17mm (27mm equiv)
17-40mm at 17mm (27mm equiv)


Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi lens group test coverage, telephoto

Next up came the telephoto-end of each lens. Again to compare their actual coverage in real-life we shot the same scene with each lens within a few moments of each other from a tripod to ensure a consistent position. Here the lenses were set to their longest focal lengths. Results for all four lenses are pictured below.

Here the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm is clear, and gives it greater compositional versatility than the pair which top-out at 55mm, and over twice the reach of the EF 17-40mm.

So in terms of coverage, only the EF-S 17-85mm offers a significant benefit over the kit EF-S 18-55mm lens. The EF-S 17-55mm delivers virtually the same range, while the EF 17-40mm is noticeably shorter.



 
Canon EF-S 18-55mm
Canon EF-S 17-85mm
Canon EF-S 17-55mm
Canon EF 17-40mm
Canon EF-S 18-55mm at 55mm   Canon EF-S 17-85mm at 85mm   Canon EF-S 17-55mm at 55mm   Canon EF 17-40mm at 40mm
18-55mm at 55mm (88mm equiv)
17-85mm at 85mm (136mm equiv)
17-55mm at 55mm (88mm equiv)
17-40mm at 40mm (64mm equiv)

Image Stabilisation

The EF-S 17-55 and EF-S 17-85mm lenses both feature Image Stabilisation (IS) facilities which greatly reduce the risk of camera-shake. This allows you to shoot under much lower light conditions without needing a tripod, or increasing the sensitivity and compromising noise levels as a result.

Both lenses claim up to three stops of compensation, which should allow you to use shutter speeds up to eight times slower than before. For example, if the slowest exposure you could confidently handhold at a certain focal length was, say, 1/60 of a second, three stops of compensation should enable you to enjoy the same result at 1/8 (or more accurately, 1/7.5).

As with all anti-shake systems, the effectiveness of IS varies between photographers and the particular shooting conditions, but its benefits are clear. We found they allowed us to handhold much slower exposures than before and eliminated camera-shake on virtually all images. Image Stabilisation is a great reason to upgrade from the EF-S 18-55mm kit lens. For examples of Image Stabilisation in practice, see our Canon 17-55mm and Canon 17-85mm reviews.



Support this site by checking prices below or shopping via our affiliate stores


Canon EF-S 17-85 IS USM


 
Canon EF-S 17-55 IS USM


 
Canon EF 17-40 L


All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2009 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

About Us / How we test / Best Buys / Advertising / Home