Support Cameralabs by shopping at my partner stores or buying me a coffee!
Buy me a coffee!

Follow my RSS feed at Camera Labs RSS Feed
  Latest camera reviews

Lumix G80 / G85
Olympus OMD EM1 II
Sony RX10 Mark III
Sony RX100 Mark V
Nikon COOLPIX B700
Sony A6500
Lumix FZ2000 / FZ2500
Nikon COOLPIX B500
Lumix LX10 / LX15
Fujifilm XT2
Nikon D3400
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
Ricoh GR II
Canon G7X Mark II
Canon SX720 HS
Canon EOS 80D
Olympus TG Tracker
Nikon D500 review
Canon EOS 1300D / T6
Lumix GX80 / GX85
Fujifilm X-Pro2
Fujifilm X70
Lumix TZ80 ZS60
Sony A6300
Canon PowerShot G5X
Lumix TZ100 ZS100
Sony A7s Mark II
Sony RX10 II
Lumix FZ330 / FZ300
Sony RX100 IV
Canon G9X
Fujifilm XT10
Nikon COOLPIX L840
Canon SX530 HS
Olympus OMD EM10 II
Canon SX410 IS
Panasonic Lumix GX8
Olympus TOUGH TG860
Sony A7r Mark II
Canon PowerShot D30
Olympus TOUGH TG4
Canon PowerShot G3X
Canon EOS 5Ds
Nikon COOLPIX S9900
Sony HX90V
Canon EOS T6s 760D
Panasonic Lumix G7
Panasonic Lumix SZ8
Canon EOS M3
Olympus EPL7
Samsung NX3000
Panasonic Lumix GM5
Nikon D5500
Panasonic Lumix GF7
Olympus OMD EM5 II
Nikon COOLPIX S9700
Canon SX710 HS
Panasonic TZ70 / ZS50
Sony Alpha A7 Mark II
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Fujifilm X100T
Nikon COOLPIX S3600
Sony Alpha A5100
Sigma DP1 Quattro
Sony Cyber-shot W830
Nikon COOLPIX L830
Nikon D750
Canon SX400 IS
Sony Cyber-shot H400
Panasonic Lumix LX100
Canon SX60 HS
Canon ELPH 340 IXUS 265
Canon G7X
Nikon COOLPIX P530
Canon SX520 HS
Canon G1 X Mark II
Panasonic Lumix FZ1000
Panasonic TZ60 / ZS40
Sony RX100 III review
Sony A3000 review
Canon EOS 1200D T5
Sony WX350
Nikon P600
Sony Alpha A5000
Sony Cyber-shot HX400V
Panasonic Lumix GH4
Panasonic TS5 FT5
Sony Alpha A6000
Canon SX700 HS
Canon SX600 HS
Olympus TOUGH TG2
Nikon AW1
Nikon D3300
Fujifilm XT1
Olympus STYLUS 1
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Olympus OMD EM1
Panasonic Lumix GM1
Nikon D610
Sony Alpha A7
Nikon D5300
Canon PowerShot A2500
Sony Alpha A7r
Canon ELPH 130 IXUS 140
Nikon COOLPIX P520
Nikon COOLPIX L820
Canon PowerShot S120
Panasonic Lumix GX7
Canon SX510 HS
Canon PowerShot G16
Fujifilm X20
Panasonic FZ70 / FZ72
Canon EOS 70D
Sony RX100 II
Canon ELPH 330 IXUS 255
Panasonic Lumix GF6
Fujifilm XM1
Olympus EP5
Panasonic Lumix LF1
Panasonic TZ35 / ZS25
Olympus XZ2
Sony HX300
Panasonic Lumix G6
Sony HX50V
Fujifilm X100S
Canon SX280 HS
Canon EOS SL1 / 100D
Panasonic TZ40 / ZS30
Nikon D7100
Fujifilm X-E1
Canon EOS 6D
Nikon D5200
Panasonic Lumix GH3
Canon PowerShot S110
Panasonic Lumix G5
Sony NEX-6
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Nikon COOLPIX P7700
Olympus E-PL5
Canon EOS M
Panasonic TS20 / FT20
Canon PowerShot G15
Nikon D600
Nikon COOLPIX L810
Canon PowerShot D20
Sony RX100
Panasonic Lumix LX7
Canon SX500 IS
Fujifilm HS30 EXR
Sony HX200V
Panasonic FZ60 / FZ62
Canon 520HS / 500HS
Canon 110HS / 125HS
Nikon D800
Canon EOS T4i / 650D
Canon PowerShot A3400
Panasonic ZS15 / TZ25
Olympus E-M5
Nikon D3200
Fujifilm X-Pro1
Canon PowerShot A2300
Canon SX240 / SX260
Samsung NX200
Sony Alpha SLT-A77
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Panasonic ZS20 / TZ30
Canon PowerShot G1 X
Sony NEX-7
Panasonic GX1
Olympus E-PM1
Nikon V1
Sony NEX-5N
Canon EOS T3 / 1100D
Canon EOS 600D / T3i
Nikon D7000
Canon EOS 60D
Canon EOS 550D / T2i
Canon EOS 7D

All camera reviews
  Best Buys: our top models
  Best Canon lens
Best Nikon lens
Best Sony lens
Best budget DSLR
Best mid-range DSLR
Best semi-pro DSLR
Best point and shoot
Best superzoom
Best camera accessories

Camera Labs Forum

Any questions, comments or a great tip to share? Join my Camera forum and let everyone know!
  DSLR Tips

Free Shipping on ALL Products
Choosing the right PC Power Supply Gordon Laing, October 2009
  Choosing PC power supplies - and saving money!

Modern PCs may feature a number of power saving technologies and increasingly efficient parts, but a typical system could still easily consume well over 200 Watts running at full steam, or more than 150 Watts even when idle – and that doesn’t even include the display.

Since most work computers are powered-up for at least one third of every day, their power consumption can represent a significant portion of your electricity bill. This of course can seriously add up if you’re running over longer periods of time or operating multiple PCs. The heat generated by PCs also means more work for air conditioning systems, which in turn results in bigger bills.

PCs which consume less power and generate lower heat are of course the answer, but there’s no need for us to abandon high-performance desktops and switch to environmentally-friendly laptops. Believe it or not, by switching one component in your desktop PC, you could potentially save power and generate less heat and noise without any compromise in performance. That component is your power supply, and in this article I’ll show you how spending around $100 USD saved me over 10% in direct power consumption, while also generating less heat and noise.

Like all PC components, the more you know about power supplies, the better equipped you’ll be when choosing the right model for your system. The most obvious specification to consider is the rating in Watts, but that’s about as far as many buyers look. In marketing terms, a 500 Watt power supply may seem better than a 350 Watt model, but dig a little deeper and you’ll see why this single figure doesn’t tell the whole story.

A PC power supply has to convert mains AC into a variety of DC outputs. A modern unit will deliver three main DC outputs – or rails – at +12v, +5v and +3.3v. In addition there’ll be a -12v and +5VSB rail, the latter allowing a PC to come out of standby.

The total output of a power supply will be divided between these rails, but in different ratios depending on the quality of the unit in question. In a modern PC the processor and graphics card both consume 12v, which, as the hungriest components, makes the +12v rail in a power supply the most important.

So you should be looking for a power supply which delivers the lion’s share of its output on the +12v rail, but lesser models may not. Check the label on the side of a power supply to see the breakdown in Amps.

Avoid power supplies which deliver more Amps to their +3.3v and +5v rails than they do to the +12v rail. This is an easy way to boost the total Wattage figure for marketing purposes, while neglecting the critical +12v rail. Ideally, the amount of Watts a power supply can deliver to the +12v rail should be around three quarters or more of its total power rating. To find out, simply multiply the number of Amps for the +12v rail by 12 and see how many Watts you end up with.

It’s also important to check the conditions under which the manufacturer’s quoted figures have been taken. Many budget models quote ratings at ambient room temperatures or those within the PC case, but the power supply itself will normally be running much hotter. Power supplies don’t perform as well at higher temperatures, so beware of figures taken at around 25 degrees Celsius and instead look for ones under more typical conditions like 50 degrees.

So how many Watts do you really need? A number of online calculators will provide an estimate given the specifications of your system and your desire to overclock; try Outer Vision’s Extreme calculator.

It’s also recommended to comfortably over-specify your power supply, not just to accommodate hungrier components in the future, but also because power supplies run at their most efficient when delivering considerably less than their maximum output. This in turn means lower power bills, and cooler PCs with less waste as heat.

If a typical modern PC consumes around 200 Watts under a hefty load, then it would seem reasonable to couple it with something like a 250 Watt power supply. That would give you enough power under load, with a little spare on top.

Unfortunately such a configuration would actually be very inefficient, consuming more power than necessary while also running hot, requiring potentially noisy cooling; indeed unless it was a high quality unit, it may not even deliver sufficient juice on the required rails to reliably power the system in the first place.

Most decent PC power supplies actually perform at their most efficient when delivering roughly half their rated output, so if your components typically draw around 200 Watts, then you’d ideally be coupling them with a power supply rated at 400 Watts or maybe higher still if you planned on upgrading in the future.

The important thing to remember is a power supply won’t constantly consume electricity at its maximum rating. It will only deliver the amount of power the PC requires at any given time, so even something as hefty as a 1000 Watt supply may only draw a fifth of that in normal operation.

Buying memory? Support us by shopping at Crucial!

So a well-designed power supply with a decent rating will only consume what it needs, but will do so more efficiently than a lesser model, thereby reducing power bills along with heat and noise. Indeed the only downside in buying a higher-rated PSU is paying a little more for the unit to start with.

To put this theory into practice I upgraded the power supply in one of my office PCs. At the time of testing, this consisted of an Asus P5W DH Deluxe motherboard with a Core 2 Duo E6700 processor, 6GB of Crucial DDR-2 memory, a Gigabyte NX66256DP (Nvidia 6600) graphics card and four 300GB Seagate hard disks, three of which were in a Promise hardware RAID 5 configuration.

The existing power supply was a 365 Watt model from Enermax. This is a very respectable company, but the model itself was bought and fitted over two and a half years previously when I ran a single core Pentium 4, a lesser graphics card and just one hard disk. The power supply had been more than adequate running this original configuration, but over the years I’d upgraded the processor, graphics card and added no fewer than three extra hard disks, so it was clearly under greater pressure than before.

With Vista booted and disk activity essentially idle, I measured 170 Watts being drawn from the mains socket using a Maplin power meter; this rose to 209 Watts under 100% load when transcoding a video file. While the latter was still far from the maximum rated output of my power supply, I still wondered how a newer and more powerful model would compare.

So I powered down my PC, disconnected the old power supply and fitted a newer Corsair HX 520W model, which as its name suggests, has a maximum rated output of 520 Watts. Looking deeper at the specifications reveals triple +12 Volt rails with a combined rating of 40 Amps. The HX 520W also employs a quiet 120mm fan and a modular design which uses detachable drive and graphics power cables so there’s the minimum of clutter inside your case – just connect the cables you need and leave the others for future upgrades. For a fair comparison I ensured all the same components and drives were connected as before.

With the new power supply fitted, I re-measured the power consumption under exactly the same conditions as before. With Vista booted and the system idle, the power consumption measured 153 Watts – that’s 17 Watts less than before. Under 100% load when transcoding the same video file at the same point, the meter measured 182 Watts – that’s 27 fewer Watts. The new power supply was also more efficient even when the PC was shutdown, drawing 6 Watts compared to the 9 of its predecessor.

Switching to a more efficient power supply made a significant saving on my system: it consumed 10% less power when idle, 13% less under full load and 33% less when shutdown. By running more efficiently, the new power supply was also cooler and quieter in operation.

Remember this didn’t involve downgrading any components, throttling existing ones or tweaking any settings. The performance remained exactly the same as before with the only change being the power supply.

This is a great result for the Corsair HX 520W, although similar benefits can also be enjoyed with other quality power supplies including those from companies like Enermax and Zalman. The key as described above is to buy a model that’s both honest about its rating and comfortably over-specified for your current or future configuration.

The latter was where I’d tripped-up, thanks partly to a motherboard which lasted much longer than I’d originally anticipated. I normally rebuild my work PC every year or so, carefully matching all the new components including the power supply, but with my existing motherboard happily accommodating new technologies, I’d steadily upgraded individual parts rather than replacing the whole thing. Along with the motherboard, the other component which remained constant over this time was the power supply, which subsequently became less efficient with the steadily updated configuration.

Buying PC parts?
Support us by shopping here!

So this article serves not just to prove how an over-specified modern power supply can save you money, but also as a reminder for anyone who, like me, has upgraded hungry components without ensuring their power supply was still appropriate for the job. To be fair, my ageing Enermax PSU was able to cope with my current configuration, but the newer and higher-rated Corsair model could do so with less power, heat and noise. Not bad for the money, and Recommended.

The readings with the PC shutdown also remind us electrical equipment can consume power even when not switched on. The newer Corsair model may have consumed one third less power with the PC shutdown, but that’s still six Watts for effectively doing nothing. So the moral here is after shutting down at the end of the day, always switch the power off at the wall to ensure you’re not wasting energy and money. Discuss this article in the forum!

All words, images, videos and layout, copyright 2005-2017 Gordon Laing. May not be used without permission.

/ Best Cameras / Camera reviews / Supporting Camera Labs